Re: Regulation Theory

2000-04-29 Thread Michael Hoover
There's an article in the Braudel Center journal I referred to yesterday (in reference to Frank and his critics )dealing with Maori capitalism in New Zealand, which is apparently influenced by regulation theory. Wallerstein also refers to it in his article as one of among different

Regulation theory

2000-04-28 Thread Louis Proyect
There's an article in the Braudel Center journal I referred to yesterday (in reference to Frank and his critics )dealing with Maori capitalism in New Zealand, which is apparently influenced by regulation theory. Wallerstein also refers to it in his article as one of among different contending

RE: Regulation theory

2000-04-28 Thread Nathan Newman
Without claiming great expertise and relying on memory of readings from a number of years ago, Regulation theory refers largely to a framework of analysis echoing Gramsci's Fordist analysis arguing that late capitalism in the 1930s entered into a new form of social organization where regulated

Re: RE: Regulation theory

2000-04-28 Thread Rod Hay
be recognized and described. That the history of capitalism can be periodized according the changing types of insitutions that regulate it. Rod Nathan Newman wrote: Without claiming great expertise and relying on memory of readings from a number of years ago, Regulation theory refers largely

Re: Re: RE: Regulation theory

2000-04-28 Thread Christian A. Gregory
Howdee, Regulation theory has any number of origins--Alain Lipietz, one its exemplars, argued that the analyses of "regulation" were in part an attempt to push the limits of Althusser's notion of "reproduction" in such a way as to imagine how different kinds of externalitie

Regulation theory

2000-04-28 Thread Sam Pawlett
"Christian A. Gregory" wrote: Bob Jessop has a fairly easy to read and very good intro to regulation theory in Michael Storper and Allen Scott, "Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development." I'd also reccommend Alice Amsden's (dead-on) rejoinder to Lipietz

[PEN-L:1966] Re: SSA Regulation Theory

1995-12-14 Thread Blair Sandler
At 1:07 PM 12/13/95, Doug Henwood wrote: At 12:15 PM 12/13/95, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was very interested in Terry McDonough's comments about Sam Bowles being a "one-man crisis of Marxism," and the general drift to the Right of a lot of left economists. I've found the discussion of the

[PEN-L:1921] Re: SSA Regulation Theory

1995-12-13 Thread Terrence Mc Donough
of Regulation theory demonstrates (to take another instance Marxist feminism has recently degenerated into individual agency theory cf. Folbre and McCrate [hi! if you're out there]). Thus most frameworks of thought will have more Marxist and less Marxist practitioners with the more Marxist

[PEN-L:1933] Re: SSA Regulation Theory

1995-12-13 Thread akliman
I was very interested in Terry McDonough's comments about Sam Bowles being a "one-man crisis of Marxism," and the general drift to the Right of a lot of left economists. I've found the discussion of the Regulationists interesting, but Terry has highlighted a broader phenomenon. What

[PEN-L:1936] Re: SSA Regulation Theory

1995-12-13 Thread Louis N Proyect
On Wed, 13 Dec 1995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was very interested in Terry McDonough's comments about Sam Bowles being a "one-man crisis of Marxism," and the general drift to the Right of a lot of left economists. I've found the discussion of the Regulationists interesting, but Terry

[PEN-L:1859] SSA Regulation Theory

1995-12-11 Thread Eric Nilsson
Re Terry McDonough's message on Regulation/SSA theory. I agree that there are lots of problems with how SSA theory and Regulation theory go about constructing themselves. First, I believe they often mistake the contingent for the fundamental. Terry McDonough writes, about the need for security