On Feb 7, 2008, at 7:58 AM, Matthijs Krul wrote:
Obama's support comes mainly from a vast
amount of small individual donations, whereas Hillary is much more
reliant
on large donors and companies.
Yeah, he's gotten more small donations than she has, but he also gets
the big bucks from the
Clean Black Nuclear Obama Power:
http://www.deq.idaho.gov/inl_oversight/waste/images/snf_dry_storage_can_000.jpg
Matthijs Krul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there are good leftist reasons to
support him.
As was already pointed out, Obama's support comes mainly from a vast
amount of small
Just to add my two cents to the Obama/Hillary issue. I'm not an American,
so I don't have a vote in the US elections anyway, but I would definitely
prefer Obama over Clinton. None of us, I'm sure, have any illusions about
Obama being even remotely radical, neither on economic or nor on so-called
http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/2787/poaweb3ms.jpg
Leigh Meyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... children training as terrorists
-
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Jim Devine
I think that was
in 1972, when the CP ran its own independent campaign, but most of its
members supported McGovern
CB: Did you do a poll of the members or did you get this info from the
FBI ? Most party members are not public because there is not freedom of
political
me:
I think that was
in 1972, when the CP ran its own independent campaign, but most of its
members supported McGovern
Charles:
Did you do a poll of the members or did you get this info from the
FBI ? Most party members are not public because there is not freedom of
political association
A question for all those election pundits, I will be voting for the first time
from Copenhagen, how does one win a US election without money (big or small)?
Do small donors mean they do not expect anything politically from their winning
candidate ans does large donors necessarily want
On Feb 7, 2008, at 12:33 PM, ravi wrote:
On Feb 7, 2008, at 7:58 AM, Matthijs Krul wrote:
As was already pointed out, Obama's support comes mainly from a vast
amount of small individual donations, ...
43% of Obama's donations come from donors who give more than $2300.
Only 26% comes from
CB: No, they considered it a Business Party, and said so.
Louis Proyect wrote:
Do you have a citation for that? I, of course, am not referring to the
3rd period, when the CP was certainly hostile to the Democrats.
I remember hearing the CP presidential candidate (Gus Hall) saying
that
CB: No, they considered it a Business Party, and said so.
Do you have a citation for that? I, of course, am not referring to the
3rd period, when the CP was certainly hostile to the Democrats.
Louis Proyect
Matthijs Krul wrote:
Even when
times were vastly rougher and the leftist challenge vastly stronger
than
they were now, like around WWI and the Great Depression, the
two-party
system in the US stood as a rock amidst the storm. It's simply not
feasible to expect it to collapse as
Matthijs Krul
Contrary to what Charles Brown thinks, I think
the Bradley effect will be quite minor - Harold Ford in the 2006
Senate
election performed more or less as polled, and he was a really
rightist
Democratic candidate in Tennessee of all places. Obama has won such
bastions of ethnic
The Legacy of Bush II
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080205_the_legacy_of_bush_ii/
Posted on Feb 5, 2008
By Robert Scheer
Curb your enthusiasm. Even if your favored candidate did well on Super
Tuesday, ask yourself if he or she will seriously challenge the
bloated military budget that
everybody.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:30:37PM -0500, Charles Brown wrote:
Who just me ?
Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/2008 5:20 PM
Be nice.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:14:01PM -0500, Charles Brown wrote:
But you are not tired of being offensive ?
--
Michael Perelman
Fidel Castro
Stokley Carmichael
Martin Luther King Jr.
Abbie Hoffman
Jerry Rubin
[February 07 2008] Travus T. Hipp Morning News Commentary: I Don't
Mean To Sound 'Hope'-Less But I've Had These Hopes And Inspirations
Before - Why Barack Obama's 'Hope' Urges Me Towards Hillary Clinton
In the news
CB: I believe this was because the CP considered itself a Labor Party.
Sort of like the Bolsheviks were the Social Democratic _Labor_ Party.
Squelch is a loaded term in this context, therefore. They would be
saying , if you want to build a labor party, support us.
Instead I think that the CP
Who just me ?
Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/2008 5:20 PM
Be nice.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:14:01PM -0500, Charles Brown wrote:
But you are not tired of being offensive ?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
Be nice.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:14:01PM -0500, Charles Brown wrote:
But you are not tired of being offensive ?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
michaelperelman.wordpress.com
But you are not tired of being offensive ?
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/2008 4:47 PM
I'm tired of this defensiveness.
On Feb 7, 2008 1:16 PM, Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jim Devine
Charles:
Did you do a poll of the members or did you get this info from the
FBI ? Most
I'm tired of this defensiveness.
On Feb 7, 2008 1:16 PM, Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Devine
Charles:
Did you do a poll of the members or did you get this info from the
FBI ? Most party members are not public because there is not freedom
of
political association for
Matthijs Krul wrote:
Even when
times were vastly rougher and the leftist challenge vastly stronger than
they were now, like around WWI and the Great Depression, the two-party
system in the US stood as a rock amidst the storm. It's simply not
feasible to expect it to collapse as long as plurality
Jim Devine
Charles:
Did you do a poll of the members or did you get this info from the
FBI ? Most party members are not public because there is not freedom
of
political association for Communists in the US.
no, I didn't do a poll. But that was the word on the street and my
friends in the CP
Very astute, especially because I agree with you.
Just to add my two cents to the Obama/Hillary issue.
3 thumbs up!: http://leighm.net/images/incvl.jpg
On Feb 7, 2008 2:47 PM, Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everybody.
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:30:37PM -0500, Charles Brown wrote:
Who just me ?
Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/2008 5:20 PM
Be nice.
On Thu,
Louis Proyect
CB: No, they considered it a Business Party, and said so.
Do you have a citation for that? I, of course, am not referring to the
3rd period, when the CP was certainly hostile to the Democrats.
CB: Why aren't you referring to the 3rd period ?
I believe I saw it in Party
Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/2008 12:05 PM
CB: I believe this was because the CP considered itself a Labor
Party.
Sort of like the Bolsheviks were the Social Democratic _Labor_
Party.
Squelch is a loaded term in this context, therefore. They would
be
saying , if you want to build a
On Feb 7, 2008, at 7:58 AM, Matthijs Krul wrote:
As was already pointed out, Obama's support comes mainly from a vast
amount of small individual donations, ...
43% of Obama's donations come from donors who give more than $2300.
Only 26% comes from those who donate less than $200. So his
. . . I think that was in 1972, when the CP ran its
own independent campaign, but most of its members
supported McGovern
CB: Did you do a poll of the members or did you
get this info from the FBI ?***
By 1972, weren't most of its members _employed_ by the FBI?
according to SLATE:
The NY [TIMES] notes that, based on 2007 fund-raising figures, no one
got a bigger bang for his buck than Mike Huckabee. The former Arkansas
governor won 156 delegates at a cost of approximately $45,000 each.
Mitt Romney, on the other hand, spent $654,000 per delegate. But
Santa Cruz can kiss it's *whole* business model Buh-Bye.
Americans give up lattes, vacations as economy sours
By Tony Pugh | McClatchy Newspapers
Posted on Thursday, February 7, 2008
WASHINGTON — With the economy in a nosedive, Americans are shedding
unnecessary expenses, saving their cash
30 matches
Mail list logo
