Re: [PEN-L] what the hell!

2005-12-08 Thread Max B. Sawicky
Not to excuse their behavior but a) the public thinks the tax cuts being voted are the ones with more widespread effects, rather than what in fact they are, namely focused on capital gains and dividends; b) the bill includes stuff very hard to vote against - like Katrina aid, tuition assistance

Re: [PEN-L] what the hell!

2005-12-08 Thread Carrol Cox
Max B. Sawicky wrote: c) you don't want to be on the losing end of a winning vote for tax cuts Fifty-eight years ago Truman vetoed a tax-cut (passed over his veto) and won an election he should have lost. And there's not going to be any progressive victories through voting at the present

Re: [PEN-L] what the hell!

2005-12-08 Thread Michael Perelman
Let us hope that the good doctor Sawicky is not overestimating the clowns masquerading as an opposition. I need some good news. Surprisingly, just as Mr. Alito appears ready to join the Supremes, we have a couple good signs from the judiciary. Mumia took a small step toward a retrial and the

Re: [PEN-L] what the hell!

2005-12-08 Thread Jim Devine
On 12/8/05, Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe Schwarzenegger will grant Tookie clemency from the death sentence today. I have a speculation that's wilder than the one I posted by the idiot pundit (about Dubya announcing that he was pulling out of Iraq, which of course didn't

[PEN-L] what the hell!

2005-12-07 Thread Michael Perelman
Why are the idiot Democrats jumping on with the Repugs in this latest round of tax cuts? Does anybody have an idea? -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu