Re: Re: Re: A reply to Ellen Meiksins Wood

2001-05-25 Thread Brad DeLong
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: Ricardo is implying that if you are born rich in the Third World, you are of necessity forever trapped in the aristocratic ideology of enjoying leisure dependence upon servants, moreover endorsing the social relations that give you many servants who wait upon you,

Re: Re: A reply to Ellen Meiksins Wood

2001-05-24 Thread Brad DeLong
Ricardo Duchesne wrote: Like to read her exact words. Know she likes the good life, Columbia's salary, speaking tours, expensive Indian garments, servant baths and all. So should she wear a hair shirt and live on table scraps instead? Doug Columbia faculty get servant baths? Gee. Inequality

Re: Re: A reply to Ellen Meiksins Wood

2001-05-24 Thread Doug Henwood
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: Ricardo is implying that if you are born rich in the Third World, you are of necessity forever trapped in the aristocratic ideology of enjoying leisure dependence upon servants, moreover endorsing the social relations that give you many servants who wait upon you,

Re: Re: Re: A reply to Ellen Meiksins Wood

2001-05-24 Thread Stephen E Philion
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Doug Henwood wrote: Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: Ricardo is implying that if you are born rich in the Third World, you are of necessity forever trapped in the aristocratic ideology of enjoying leisure dependence upon servants, moreover endorsing the social relations that

Re: Re: Re: Re: A reply to Ellen Meiksins Wood

2001-05-24 Thread Doug Henwood
Stephen E Philion wrote: I had the chance out here in Hawaii to see Harvey and Spivak speak last month. Harvey, as dry as his speaking style is, was clearly making links between issues of globalization, culture, envronment and political economy. Spivak's talk was very frustrating on the other

Re: Re: Re: Re: A reply to Ellen Meiksins Wood

2001-05-24 Thread Colin Danby
The Big Boys she meant were left political economists and such, not the ruling class. But you're right that her comments on political economy aren't any great shakes. Doug Spivak isn't a political economist, but she's willing to engage political economy. Her work and informed critique of

Re: Re: A reply to Ellen Meiksins Wood

2001-05-23 Thread christian11
By the standards of world historians - or anyone who disagrees that Europe was uniquely prepared for modern capitalism, or that by the 16th-17th centuries capitalism was fully underway in England, Brenner, Wood, including Anderson, and all the British Marxist historians ARE eurocentric.To the

Re: Re: Re: Re: A reply to Ellen Meiksins Wood

2001-05-22 Thread Louis Proyect
with equally serious arguments. It's no wonder Brenner wouldn't care to debate the issues with you, you can't even acknowledge that your opponents are worthy of respect for taking your arguments seriously enough that they give sustained and careful responses to them. Steve Actually, I began