Re: Email::Address::XS

2016-11-12 Thread pali
On Monday 05 September 2016 10:25:11 p...@cpan.org wrote: > On Saturday 03 September 2016 18:24:56 Ricardo Signes wrote: > > The Email::MIME changes look like they could be broken up into > > several PRs, some of which would be obviously good to apply > > immediately, like removals of dead code

Re: Email::Address::XS

2016-11-12 Thread pali
On Sunday 04 September 2016 00:24:56 Ricardo Signes wrote: > If we never *store* objects, but only produce them as requested, then > I think the total needed changes are -- but I'm sure I'll miss > things -- as follows: > > * allow header_str and header args to Email::MIME->create to include >