* Joseph Crotty [2011-11-10T23:31:39]
> All, an initial patch to get the ball rolling. Untested, but hope helps.
> Some sections have comments with no action taken as unsure the correct
> course of action.
This patch doesn't even result in compiling code.
I'll have a look at what's changed in th
All, an initial patch to get the ball rolling. Untested, but hope helps.
Some sections have comments with no action taken as unsure the correct
course of action.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Ricardo Signes
wrote:
> * Steve Atkins [2011-11-10T20:25:26]
> > > I need to be sending out ARF (i.e.
* Steve Atkins [2011-11-10T20:25:26]
> > I need to be sending out ARF (i.e., RFC 5965) reports on a production
> > systems, possibly 100-1,000 ARFS/second, using perl.
>
> That's pretty high volume.
Yes. I'm not sure how Email::ARF will do, but am interested to find out...
> > What's my best
On Nov 10, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Joseph Crotty wrote:
> I need to be sending out ARF (i.e., RFC 5965) reports on a production
> systems, possibly 100-1,000 ARFS/second, using perl.
That's pretty high volume.
> What's my best bet
> both in terms of performance and adherence to RFC draft spec for AR