eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Task-Catalyst` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Stop building for 32-bit x86
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing
ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
I see. Could you please mention flamegraph in the commit message? E.g. "Stop
building for 32-bit x86 because of flamegraph".
``
To reply, visit the link below
jjames commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
I have updated the PR to include the comment above the License tag.
The php stack is [dropping its i386
builds](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php_no_32_bit). The flamegraph
package
ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
Indeed. perl-Devel-NYTProf is fullarch. @jjames, what's the problem with
flamegraph?
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst/pull-request/1
--
mspacek commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
flamegraph is noarch too.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel
ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you
are following:
``
perl-Task-Catalyst is noarch. What's the point of ExcludeArch? Preventing from
building it on i686 builders because perl-Devel-NYTProf requires flamegraph
which wont be there? Could you please write
jjames opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Task-Catalyst` that
you are following:
``
Stop building for 32-bit x86
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel
