Adam Kennedy writes:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Tony Bowden wrote:
What's the difference to you between me shipping a a .t file that
uses Pod::Coverage, or by having an internal system that uses
Devel::Cover in a mode that makes sure I have 100% coverage on
everything,
Adam Kennedy writes:
Michael Graham wrote:
Another good reason to ship all of your development tests with code
is that it makes it easer for users to submit patches with tests.
Or to fork your code and retain all your development tools and
methods.
Perl::MinimumVersion, which
chromatic writes:
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 20:59 -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
And the more the better!
Well sure. Two-space indent is clearly better than one-space indent,
and four-space is at least twice as good as that.
Negative quality for anybody who includes a literal tab character
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:24:01AM +, Smylers wrote:
Negative quality for anybody who includes a literal tab character
anywhere in the distro's source!
Negative quality for anyone whose files appear to have been edited in
emacs!
Tony
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 12:17:17AM +, Smylers wrote:
Remember that we aren't measuring quality, but kwalitee. Kwalitee is
supposed to provide a reasonable indication of quality, so far as that's
possible. So what matters in determining whether a kwalitee heuristic
is appropriate is
Tony Bowden wrote:
so even if a neural net (or whatever) did come up
with the above substring heuristic, once it's know then authors can game
the system by artificially crowbarring into their modules' sources, at
which point the heuristic loses value.
I thought the idea was that we /wanted/
Tony == Tony Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tony Negative quality for anyone whose files appear to have been edited in
Tony emacs!
Now, them's fightin' words!
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
merlyn@stonehenge.com
On Apr 16, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Adam Kennedy wrote:
JSPANTS, you mean? I think we need a CJSPAN, first. Alias?
Yes well... I'm getting there slowly.
JavaScript::Librarian + Algorithm::Dependency + YAML ought to be
enough to get some basics sorted out...
Well, you should know that there are a now a
On Apr 16, 2005, at 3:00 PM, Adam Kennedy wrote:
It's going to totally depend on what you want to wrap around it...
Do you want the human interacty mode? Or the machine county mode.
machine county mode? Just that, I think.
Forget the document object for a moment, you are more accurately in
the
Michael G Schwern wrote:
tie() always returns an object.
The object returned by the new method is also
returned by the tie function, which would be useful if you
want to access other methods in CLASSNAME.
Your insight's and Kevin's were incorporated
Well, you should know that there are a now a number of people I know of
who are working on JSAN-y things in parallel. I've Cc'd them on this
message. Maybe we should set up a mail list somewhere an coordinate our
efforts? What would be the proper venue for that?
I'm betting there is no
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 05:23:56PM -0400, jesse wrote:
I'm betting there is no javascript community organization we can
leverage.
Perhaps the DynAPI folks might be interested.
http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/dynapi/
And then there's the whole Ajax thing which I'm not really up on enough
to
On Apr 17, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Perhaps the DynAPI folks might be interested.
http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/dynapi/
Perhaps, But then the mail lists are simply hosted by SourceForge. Ick.
And then there's the whole Ajax thing which I'm not really up on enough
to detect if
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:26:32PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote:
On Apr 17, 2005, at 3:12 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Perhaps the DynAPI folks might be interested.
http://dynapi.sourceforge.net/dynapi/
Perhaps, But then the mail lists are simply hosted by SourceForge. Ick.
Sorry, the point
14 matches
Mail list logo
