Michael Graham wrote:
As I was downloading the newest version of Devel::Cover this morning, I
pondered on the concept of 1 Kwalitee point for coverage = 80%, and
another for 100%, and how absolutely impossible it would be to set out
to establish these points for all the modules on CPAN. But it
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:54:42PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
Collecting any sort of coverage data is a complete bitch. Let me just
say right now that doing it across _all_ of CPAN is flat out impossible.
It's impossible.
I completly agree.
Now, if somebody sets up a system to
Adam Kennedy wrote:
Michael Graham wrote:
[...]
But I think a more useful measure of kwalitee would be a 20%-30%
coverage test.
Something like that sounds much more reasonable than a high number.
Of course, if you've seen the first third of the PPI talk you realise we
still have all the
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:18:40PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:51:56AM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:00:39PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Covering the XS portion of the code with gcov is possible, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
I updated the graph-perl-usage package, to be found on my site or CPAN:
http://bloodgate.com/perl/graph/usage/
http://search.cpan.org/~tels/
(0.07 is the latest version, please use together with 0.30 of Graph::Easy)
I incorporated one
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Tels wrote:
If you have any ideas how to make this even more usefull, please speak
now. I will have limited email reading/writing capabilities the next two
weeks, but I *will* respond to all emails/critics/praises, even though it
may only be when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Friday 23 September 2005 19:15, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Tels wrote:
If you have any ideas how to make this even more usefull, please
speak now. I will have limited email reading/writing capabilities the
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 07:33:04PM +0200, Tels wrote:
Not yet. Good idea. The relevant code is in parse_file() in gen_graph - it
gets as option one .pm file and then does something with it.
The lopp for each file is in gather_data(), under the recurse branch:
I'll redesign the code to be
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:03:32PM -0700, Jan Dubois wrote:
Ok, thanks. I'll let you know if I get any tuits to work on it
before then.
Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't it make sense to use
Module::ScanDeps for this and put any additional heuristics in
there?
Module::ScanDeps
