Jos Boumans wrote:
Hmm, I hope this doesn't mean you plan on removing the 'non-zero exit status
on failed make test'.. that's be a real PITA for automated installers...
No, that is done by Test::Harness dying on test failure.
Neither CPAN nor CPANPLUS are under any obligation to parse their
David Golden wrote:
On 11/1/06, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Contact all the authors making use of it and suggest they switch to .t
files. Maybe I could throw a warning into MakeMaker. Also a kwalitee
check sounds like a good idea not_only_test.pl or something.
It shouldn't
A few people have asked how I do my CPAN scans. I keep a minicpan handy and
have a little script called grep_cpan which reads the index file, unpacks
each distribution, does a find | grep and then cleans up. It allows you to
search for a given pattern in a given set of files.
# search
Hi all!
See http://xrl.us/sw5o for a recipe for integrating make runtest and make
distruntest targets into a Makefile.PL-generated Makefile that makes use of
Test::Manifest.
I needed that when working on XML::RSS, so I wrote it.
Enjoy!
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Steffen Mueller wrote:
{
name='no_test_pl',
error=q{This distribution contains a file called 'test.pl' in
its main distribution directory. This indicates that it uses the old
style of creating test suites. Nowadays, tests belong into one or more
*.t files in the t/
On Nov 1, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
A few people have asked how I do my CPAN scans.
Code search engine Krugle will be at the Hackathon on Nov 11 to talk
to us about code searching.
See http://rakudo.org/hackathon-chicago/index.cgi?krugle_presentation
Maybe someone who
Hi again,
Michael G Schwern schrieb:
So making no_test_pl a kwalitee test is a good idea.
of course, adding a mention in the docs helps, too. So I should have
made it a patch. Sorry. I didn't have the svn sources.
Hence:
=item * has_test_pl
And if people decide that this should be
Hi,
Michael G Schwern schrieb:
So making no_test_pl a kwalitee test is a good idea.
So adding this to Module::CPANTS::Kwalitee::Files in the obvious place
should do exactly that. Perhaps we should call it old_testing_scheme
or so instead, but I'll go with your suggestion:
{
Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi all!
See http://xrl.us/sw5o for a recipe for integrating make runtest and make
distruntest targets into a Makefile.PL-generated Makefile that makes use of
Test::Manifest.
I needed that when working on XML::RSS, so I wrote it.
What has me scratching my head here
On 11/1/06, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This distribution uses 'test.pl' for its tests. The output of 'test.pl' is not
parsed. When
make test is run by automated installers (for example, the CPAN
shell) your tests will
always appear to have passed no matter what the output of
Michael G Schwern schrieb:
This doesn't really explain why test.pl is bad.
[...]
Agreed!
This distribution uses 'test.pl' for its tests. The output of 'test.pl' is not parsed. When
make test is run by automated installers (for example, the CPAN shell) your tests will
always appear to
demerphq wrote:
On 11/1/06, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This distribution uses 'test.pl' for its tests. The output of
'test.pl' is not parsed. When
make test is run by automated installers (for example, the CPAN
shell) your tests will
always appear to have passed no matter
12 matches
Mail list logo
