David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com writes:
https://github.com/stevan/p5-mop/
I believe that’s just a proof of concept, no?
I understood it as The Real Deal, though early work in progress.
The proofs-of-concept are Moose friends and already done.
Steffen
--
Steffen Schwigon
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:35:52 +0100, Michael G Schwern schw...@pobox.com
wrote:
As a result of the discussions, I'm now reconsidering using Mouse in TB2.
Good!
This is a critical violation of encapsulation.
Yes.
Plus, what would happen if at some point Mouse wanted to
use TB2 for its
On 2011.12.6 1:23 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
Plus, what would happen if at some point Mouse wanted to
use TB2 for its test suite?
You might have missed that part of the conversation. TB2 would not depend on
Mouse, it has its own embedded copy. It would work fine.
--
Clutter and overload
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:50:16 +0100, Michael G Schwern schw...@pobox.com
wrote:
On 2011.12.6 1:23 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
Plus, what would happen if at some point Mouse wanted to
use TB2 for its test suite?
You might have missed that part of the conversation. TB2 would not
depend on
On 2011.12.6 10:56 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
I wasn't referring to a dependency problem,
but to the actual code being the same on the
thing-that-tests and thing-that-is-being-tested.
It would be a problem if they were the same code, but they're not because
TB2::Mouse is a copy of an earlier
On Dec 5, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Leon Timmermans wrote:
So, uhh... I'm going to go do a bad thing.
What would be the repercussions of putting this in the fridge a little
longer (I know, it's been in there for far too long already) and
porting it to the upcoming mop?
*How* much longer? Does the
On Dec 5, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Leon Timmermans wrote:
*How* much longer? Does the upcoming MOP include syntax (class, method, role
keywords) and stuff like roles? Will one be able to drop Mouse in favor of
it?
I just asked doy. It will support all of that, but not on older
versions of perl,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Michael G Schwern schw...@pobox.com wrote:
As a result of the discussions, I'm now reconsidering using Mouse in TB2. Its
interesting, it's not for any of the reasons I thought, but for a distressing
encapsulation breech built into Moose.
The main concern is
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:26 AM, David E. Wheeler da...@justatheory.com wrote:
*How* much longer? Does the upcoming MOP include syntax (class, method, role
keywords) and stuff like roles? Will one be able to drop Mouse in favor of it?
I just asked doy. It will support all of that, but not on
