Uncoverable syntax (was Re: testing module loading output and testing under the debugger)

2006-12-20 Thread Michael G Schwern
Paul Johnson wrote: 1. Find some nice way expressing what is uncoverable. For subroutines this is easy. For statements it is not hard. For branches it is tricky and for conditions I'm somewhat stumped. The current method I use is based on implementation details. What's

Re: Uncoverable syntax (was Re: testing module loading output and testing under the debugger)

2006-12-20 Thread Chris Dolan
On Dec 20, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote: Well, maybe not exactly - I can probably make good arguments for inline annotation. Allow me. :) The current scheme won't track changes to the source file well. Using file + md5 rather than file + line helps some, but problems