Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-09-18 Thread Ovid
As I said in my previous email on July 7th: backwards-incompatible changes to the backwards-compatibility layer (Test::Harness) are not a good idea. The proper response is to have people impacted by this issue switch to TAP::Harness, as was suggested several years ago when Test::Harness 3.0 was

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-09-18 Thread Ricardo Signes
* Ovid curtis_ovid_...@yahoo.com [2013-09-18T04:19:28] As I said in my previous email on July 7th: backwards-incompatible changes to the backwards-compatibility layer (Test::Harness) are not a good idea. The proper response is to have people impacted by this issue switch to TAP::Harness, as

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-09-18 Thread Leon Timmermans
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Ricardo Signes perl...@rjbs.manxome.orgwrote: It looks like Module::Build already has use_tap_harness. So what's suggested is a patch to ExtUtils::MM_Any to switch from Test::Harness to TAP::Harness...? Or both just setting $Test::Harness::switches = ''…

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-09-18 Thread Ricardo Signes
* Leon Timmermans faw...@gmail.com [2013-09-18T19:21:44] Or both just setting $Test::Harness::switches = ''… Yes. I was cleaning out ~/tmp on the flight over here and I found this dzil plugin: package inc::STFUEUMM; use Moose; extends 'Dist::Zilla::Plugin::MakeMaker'; use

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-09-18 Thread Buddy Burden
Cons of adding -w to test runs: - you get warnings from dependencies (and their dependencies) because -w enables global action at a distance - using fatal warnings may cause your test suite to fail because of warnings in dependencies you don't directly control - you could