I have just used Devel::Cover successfully for the first time.
I even got the HTML pages.
Great!
But what are those numbers and colors in the columns ?
I could not find in the documentation. Please point me to the
description if it is available somewhere.
thanks
Gabor
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:00:33PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
But what are those numbers and colors in the columns ?
I could not find in the documentation. Please point me to the
description if it is available somewhere.
Percentage of the code
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Andy Lester wrote:
How am I going to test this ?
Take a look at Test::Warn for warnings, and Test::Exception for errors.
I think qa.perl.org needs a listing of Test::* modules so that people
know what's available.
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Adrian Howard wrote:
On Monday, January 19, 2004, at 06:10 pm, Gabor Szabo wrote:
If this is OT, please point me to some better place to find an answer.
[snip]
Not OT in my opinion, but you also might want to try
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TestFirstUserInterfaces
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Ed Summers wrote:
If you are testing from the cmd line
One of the prime problems of my customers is the fact that I don't give
them a nice GUI for the test tool where they can click.
the nice thing about Perl's testing
framework is that it would be feasible to write C#
Where would we be without your work ?
Out in the desert to fall prey to any bug ?
At least we can run and get some cover.
Thank you !
Gabor
Is there some command line tool that can be used to report bugs to RT ?
Something that after I saw that make test fails (or even if it just
prints warnings) I can type some command line magic and will submit
a bug report with all the relevant information including the output
of make test.
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Andy Lester wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:40:32PM -0200, Gabor Szabo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there some command line tool that can be used to report bugs to RT ?
Sure, it's called sendmail.
If you want to send a bug on Test::Harness, send an email to
[EMAIL
purple
I might like to signal Devel::Cover that func() has a constant return (or
lack thereof).
however, in the process of development we are required to analyze any of the
inevitable gaps and decide whether the unhit condition is valid. if it is
we write a test for it. if it
I am dealing with a module which has a test.pl using Test.pm
Specifically I am talking about HTML::Template for which I try to
act as a hoplite.
I am trying to add a bunch of tests in t/ using Test::More but
in order to make sure we don't lose any previous test we would like to
keep the test.pl
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Oliver Schnarchendorf wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:12:16 +0800, Kelvin Wu wrote:
dunno whether this is the right place to post, but i am looking for a
solution(for both win32 and linux), something like microsoft passport,
one login account can be used cross over domain
I can see from the testers page that Devel::Cover is supposed
to work on Windows.
Is there a ppd distribution of it somewhere so I can install
it on ActivePerl without a compiler ?
Currently if I type
ppm install Devel::Cover
I get version 0.2 of Devel::Coverage. Not what I wanted.
Gabor
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Jan Dubois wrote:
I've forwarded your message to our build engineer to look into.
Please send questions about PPM build process to the ppm mailing list
(it only accepts messages from subscribers though).
Thanks everyone for dealing with this. I hope we'll see DC
built
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Thomas Klausner wrote:
- Test coverage.
Impossibly, because CPANTS does not run code.
But it could fetch it from some other place that does it, right ?
What about adding (optional) coverage reports to the reports
the CPAN testers send in ?
Gabor
I have a script using Term::ReadLine to get input.
I'd like to test it by executing it using another script
and providing answers from the script test script.
I tried IPC::Run with no success but as I notice even simple redirection
such as
input.pl in.txt
does not work.
Any ideas how to
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Michael G Schwern wrote:
At least when *I* try to access Google with a browser I
don't see such a link.
I do see such a link but its possible Google is showing you a different
page because you're coming from .il.
yes, that might be the case.
This brings me to the question, or
So far I have been using Devel::Cover only in cases where I run code
to be analyzed directly.
I wonder how should I setup Devel::Cover to test a web application
while my test suit is
actually using WWW::Mechanize and I am exercising the relevant code
via a real web server?
How to check the
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:45:23 -0600, Walter Goulet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ok, so I've been trying to get started with testing Net-SSLeay for the
Phalanx project. Now the problem I've been having is getting my arms
around how to improve the coverage of the tests included with that
Why do we need to reinvent this wheel ?
Most of the platforms out there have some binary packaging system.
Solaris has their own, Linuxen have rpm/deb or whatever else they have.
ActiveState with its binary Perl distributions have ppm and while that's
not perfect we read that they are working on
When installing a module ( in this case Sub-Uplevel-0.09 on 5.8.8)
using CPANPLUS I saw many warnings passing by but as all the tests
were successful the report to the CPAN Testers was sent as PASS.
it would be useful to capture warnings printed on the screen
and then even somehow report this
I must be missing something but I don't understand why is there
no module that would provide the W3C validation without hitting
http://validator.w3.org and without the need to setup a similar web site?
WWW::CheckSite::Validator uses that web site
WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C provides an
I checked it again, one can download the source code of their service
from here http://validator.w3.org/source/
and it is even packaged in some of the linux distros.
(It is of course slightly outdated on Debian)
Someone might want to write a wrapper around it
or maybe use
If anybody is interested on this list,
the slides and the examples of my 2 days course are available here:
http://www.szabgab.com/perl_in_test_automation.html
regards
Gabor
On 6/25/06, Ian Langworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks a little familiar.. Great job!
I first wrote it about 2 years ago but only recently decide to
make it available to the general public.
I decided to do so now so it won't come out after the
Big Perl Testing Book you mentioned in here:
On 6/26/06, Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is really neat. You might want to add a link to Test::Expect too,
which makes it almost to easy to test terminal-based programs.
I only recently saw Test::Expect, I'll look at it more deeply and
will include a set of examples using it as
Using Test::WWW::Mechanize 1.10 I am trying to
$w-page_links_ok();
on a page that has an e-mail address in it and the test fails.
How could I tell TWM not to bother with the mailto links on the page?
Gabor
On a form the submit button looks like this:
input type=submit name=submit value=Update /
when this form is submitted using
$w-submit_form (
fields = {
fname = 'Foo',
});
the field submit and its value Update does not seem to be sent
to web server. If I add
On 7/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I fix this?
WWW::Mechanize(3pm)
$mech-submit_form( ... )
This method lets you select a form from the previously fetched page,
fill in its fields, and submit it. It combines the form_number/form_name,
On 7/11/06, Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 11, 2006, at 9:07 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
If button is not passed, then the submit() method is used
instead.
Perhaps it could be clearer then: submit() does not pass any button
unless you specify it.
Yes maybe that, in addition
While checking if the versions of all the modules are as
required in our installation I am using the following one liner to
fetch the version numbers.
perl -MModule -e'print $Module::VERSION'
Some of the modules print extra error messages and some print
only error messages.
I have sent e-mail
Hi all,
what is the current best practices for testing code that forks?
I saw there was a recent discussion about patching Test::More
to support forking.
Is that going to happen or are there better ways to do it?
Gabor
On 7/19/06, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Descriptions are optional because they are not necessary for the test.
Sometimes a test doesn't need a description, its obvious from reading
the code what its doing. Sometimes it would be redundant. Sometimes
you're just writing fast. I
On 7/20/06, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with $Level is that people don't use it correctly. You want to
solve this by providing another element of code that more people will have to
use more frequently and hoping that they use it correctly. I'm not sure that's
a good
I have a nasty workaround.
# at the beginning
my $test_allowance = 100;
plan tests = $test_allowance;
# run the tests here and for each test also execute
$test_allowance--;
# in the end
ok(1) while $test_allowance--;
I really hope there is a nicer way to do it.
Gabor
On 7/20/06, Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 20, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Adriano Ferreira wrote:
Ok, that's weird. But it may occasionally have usefulness. Gabor
started the thread with the idea of having a test against web pages,
which he doesn't know how many at the beginning, but
While using page_link_ok it checks all the links on the page,
including those that point to external sites.
It is bth unpolite - why hit their site every time I run my test script and
when I am working off line it generates false errors.
What would be the correct and easy way to test only links
On 7/21/06, Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 20, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
What would be the correct and easy way to test only links that are
internal to
the site. Maybe a
page_internal_links_ok() method?
How would you have it determine what's internal?
When
On 7/21/06, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/20/06, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am not mistaken the problem with no_plan is that the test script
might exit before actually running all the tests you wanted and Harness
won't notice it.
PS In all my years
On 8/19/06, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
During testing sometimes I would like to submit a form
either with values missing from a selection list or with illegal values
supplied.
Similarry ocassionally I would like to supply fields and values
On 7/26/06, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is some software for multiplexing between a web forum, a newsgroup, a
mailing list and an RSS feed, which could be useful. But we need to consider
whether we also want a forum (a la Gabor's http://www.cpanforum.com/ ) as
well. I wonder if
On 9/7/06, Thomas Klausner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Examples go in the installed docs or they are lost.
The docs could state that there are some ready-to-run examples in that
dir in the distribution.
In one module where we had planty of examples I addeded a script that
would creata a
On 9/7/06, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 September 2006 00:51, Gabor Szabo wrote:
In one module where we had planty of examples I addeded a script that
would creata a Module::Name::Examples.pm that is a collection of the
example files in pod format. This modules gets
On 9/7/06, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/7/06, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 September 2006 00:51, Gabor Szabo wrote:
In one module where we had planty of examples I addeded a script that
would creata a Module::Name::Examples.pm that is a collection
On 9/7/06, Salve J Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Oh, and if you want to join the fun and help a bit, here's a (probably
incomplete) list of tasks:
- Metrics:
[snip]
Would the metrics for community support channels that were suggested a while
ago be welcome? (The
In a module I have just started to maintain there were 0 tests
but there were several exampes with their expected output.
As I would like to keep the examples and I would like to have tests
but I don't want to duplicate this code I added a test t/sample.t
that would run each one of the example
Going along the path of testing the examples in my distribution,
I think it could be generalized. What do you think about this?
Gabor
=head1 NAME
Test::Example - Check if all the examples in the distribution work correctly
=head1 SYNOPSIS
use Test::Example;
test_all_examples();
or
On 9/11/06, David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They probably need to be run in the same process. What about using
Test::Output or IO::Capture to capture the output (and keep it from
Test::Harness) and just running the code with do code.pl?
Thanks, this was a good idea though the main
On 9/13/06, Thomas Klausner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it would be reasonable to also check for a POD-Heading named
LICENSE, but that's definitly more error-prone.
Maybe this metric should even check if there's a license in META.yml
AND a pod heading namen LICENSE, so that humans and tools
On 9/13/06, brian d foy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adriano
Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/06, Thomas Klausner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it would be reasonable to also check for a POD-Heading named
LICENSE, but that's definitly more error-prone.
On 9/14/06, Chris Dolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Advocacy to get popular modules to state their licenses more
prominently
* Advocacy to get modules with inconsistently stated licenses (e.g.
DSLIP vs. POD) corrected
I think if we can include it in the CPANTS tests so there might be
On 9/24/06, David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(As posted to Perl Monks, but probably a good question for this list as well)
As I've been developing CPAN::Reporter, I've been thinking about what
information I wished I had when examining failure reports on CPAN
Testers. Test::Reporter already
Great!
I would also like to see e-mail sent out the the author when her
module is analysed.
Similarry to CPAN testers this should only go out in 'bad' cases to some
arbitrary definition of 'bad'
e.g:
1) a metric turned from good to bad since the last analysis
2) overall rate of the module is
I am not exactly sure this is the appropriate place to raise this idea
but it relates very strongly to quality of CPAN modules.
Occasionally new version of CPAN modules break code in applications.
We cannot catch that, but we can at least catch cases when it breaks
other CPAN modules.
There
would be a good idea at all. On the other
hand if there is a newer version with the security fix and the module works well
with the rest of the CPAN modules then Bundle authors could update their bundle
in a reasonable time.
Gabor
--
Gabor Szabo
http://www.szabgab.com/
On 10/31/06, Andreas J. Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:51:42 +0200, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
What about adding a mechanism to PAUSE to map module/version pairs
to the bundles they are mentioned in? One could parse the most recent
bundles, extract
On 10/31/06, David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you should consider writing a CPAN::Mini extension that makes
it easy to create and maintain a minicpan repository with the features
that you want. Rather than mirroring just CPAN, I would imagine it
would probably draw from Backpan as
In Module::Build I can set
recursive_test_files = 1,
so I can organize my test files in subdirectories of t/
I am using
create_makefile_pl= 'traditional',
to create a readme but the Makefile.PL does not have any mention
to this recoursiveness.
Is this a bug in the makefile creation or
Recently I was asked how to determine which modules are available
for an old version of perl (5.004 or similar).
I asked about this on PerlMonks
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=586506
That resulted in this page:
http://www.szabgab.com/cpantested/
Based on the database of the CPAN Testers I
On 12/4/06, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Romano patched up Test-Simple to restore 5.4.5 compatibility. I'll see
about releasing that as 0.66. That might make a whole lot more of CPAN happy
on 5.4.x.
PS I don't see 5.4.5 in your list.
sqlite select count(*) from
On 12/4/06, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
On 12/4/06, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Romano patched up Test-Simple to restore 5.4.5
compatibility. I'll see about releasing that as 0.66. That might
make a whole lot more of CPAN
hi,
In a project I am working on there is a separate automation team.
This team gets test descriptions from the manual QA people
including steps how to implement each step:
Test A
Step 1 - Setup a smadge and set it to operation Blue
Step 2 - Setup another smadge and set it to operation
Some other ideas I saw in a real system:
- distinguish between failures in the configuration of the system under test
and the actual tes
this would yield levels such as conf_error and conf_warning
- In addition I am not sure if some of these calls should automatically bail out
as being fatal
OK, so a test failed as in
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2007/05/msg474043.html
What does the Illegal seek mean there?
Gabor
Before releasing or installing a module it might be a good thing
to test all the other CPAN modules that depend on the one to be
released or installed.
Is there a tool to do this?
How would you do this?
Gabor
--
Gabor Szabo
http://www.szabgab.com/
Perl Training in Israel http://www.pti.co.il/
On 5/26/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 May 2007, at 18:45, demerphq wrote:
Maybe ill just upload my files in zip format from now on only, then
its not my problem anymore right? Would that be better?
That would be fine.
You know - you've kind of tickled a raw nerve here.
If you have already started to argue about Windows vs Unix issues
is there a way - besides uploading to CPAN and waiting for the CPAN testers
to test my modules on platforms I don't have? [*]
Is there some publicly available Solaris/HP-UX/etc
(see full list on this page
mailing lists.
Before I start writing a program that will do that (and hoping that I
will actually have the tuits for that) is there anyone out there
already using this system?
Maybe with an automated script already?
regards
Gabor
--
Gabor Szabo
http://www.szabgab.com/
On 5/31/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 May 2007, at 08:28, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Wouldn't it would be interesting if there were a multiplexing service
for this sort of thing? E.g. maybe a system that allows you to
subscribe to a personal mailing list of sorts in much the
Hi,
I have a test that looks like this:
ok(prepare_first(), first prepared);
ok(test_first(), first is working);
ok(prepare_second(), second prepared);
ok(test_second(), second is working);
That is, there is a phase where I setup the test environment
and then there is the actual test.
SKIP might be a good idea to avoid running tests that cannot work due
to some missing prereq or bad environment or whatever but it still
does not solve the
reporting problem.
There can be calls like this
ok($ok, environment is ready);
and calls like this
ok($ok, system under test works well);
On 8/26/07, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Aug 2007, at 15:51, Randy W. Sims wrote:
I haven't followed too closely, but has anyone checked with the
CPAN smokers to see if they can set up the new harness on their
test systems to use when they are testing modules on CPAN?
and their source code on CPAN. Look at
http://kobesearch.cpan.org/ search for the modules name and look at the soruce
code.
Gabor Szabo
I would like to compare data structure in some non-test code.
Test::Deep seems to give all the features I need, except that it is
integrated with
the testing framework.
How could I use that or what else should I use to compare two deep
data structures?
Gabor
thank you all!
://cpantesters.szabgab.com/stats/
http://cpantesters.szabgab.com/stats/perl_5.5.5.html
Gabor
--
Gabor Szabo
http://www.szabgab.com/
Hi,
might be slightly unrelated to QAsorry
After installing JOSHUA/Net-Telnet-Cisco-1.10.tar.gz
if I run perl Makefile.PL on an unrelated Makefile.PL that
requires 'Net::Telnet::Cisco' = '1.10'
I get a warning
Argument 1.3.1 isn't numeric in numeric lt () at
On Dec 26, 2007 12:37 PM, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
might be slightly unrelated to QAsorry
In the future, MakeMaker issues go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for that.
After installing JOSHUA/Net-Telnet-Cisco-1.10.tar.gz
if I run perl Makefile.PL
I know I am a bit late to the party but what about Test::Anything ?
Gabor
On Feb 5, 2008 11:55 AM, Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could look at buildbot. It can do all of the above. It's in Python
if that matters :)
Or Tinderbox which was the original that buildbot copied. (Why did they have to
keep the GUI I don't know :)
Gabor
Hi Salve and others.
I have added an entry to http://adserver.szabgab.com/ advertising the
QA workshop.
It is in English and should show up in every country.
If you can send me texts in other languages as well with the
appropriate country code
I'd be glad to add them. See the linked yaml file to
I guess many of the participants of the QA Hackathon are registered here as well
so I added an entry listing who stays when and where during the Hackathon
Please add your info to it
http://perl-qa.hexten.net/wiki/index.php/Oslo_QA_Hackathon_2008
Gabor
--
Gabor Szabo
http://www.szabgab.com/
Is the detailed name and version of the OS (e.g Ubuntu Linux 7.10 ) available
in the Test reports?
I found some information in the ccversion field of %Config but that's
still only and indication.
If not I think this information might be quite useful, especially for
creating statistics and seeing
if you did not have a perl based test environment
you could also ask questions on how to set it up...
Or if you just wanted to use TAP without Perl, that could also a base
for asking questions here...
Gabor
--
Gabor Szabo
http://www.szabgab.com/
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Gergely Brautigam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One last question then I swear I will shut up :)
Why use perl for testing? Of course all others languages are used for
testing this and that.. What excels perl to be used for testing. Obviusly it
has powerfull
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Gergely Brautigam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well... We used Java with JUnit and .NET with NUnit... C++ for low level
testing and so fort and so on.. They all had there advantages and
disatvantages. I use perl for nearly one and a half year now. But appart
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Salve J Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*) Whiteboards, markers erasers.
Lots of whiteboards for taking notes. At least one whiteboard just for
projects being worked on, the grid at BarCamps is an example.
We'll have at least 5 rooms with
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, does anyone know a student?
I tried to spam all the local universities but with the current USD
exchange rate
people get about 30-40% less this year than 2 years ago...
ok, I know its not about the money.
Gabor
On the Topics page
http://perl-qa.hexten.net/wiki/index.php/Oslo_QA_Hackathon_2008_Topics
I have started to move the topics suggested by people to a separate place
and started to include a list of interested people.
I think the talks can be removed from this page as they are already
available on
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Salve J Nilsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael G Schwern said:
David Golden wrote:
I'm curious to try git, if anyone is up for teaching it.
I had the same thoughts. My concern is that we'll be spending time
futzing with git rather than hacking
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if it would be possible to take the existing .*Unit
libraries
of Java and .Net and
create some wrapper around them (or a replacement) so people with
existing tests
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Gergely Brautigam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do I have the feeling that I'm part of a Borg cube ? :D
I don't know but I should re-read my sentences *before* I send them.
It seems my English gets worse by the hour. Sorry for that.
Gabor
There were already many good answers here, let me just add my perspective
probably just repeating the previous comments.
I am not a Fit expert and I have never used that with real customers
but I did use
something resembling it as I think all of you have.
Occasionally I organize a QA Day for QA
I have arrived to Oslo this morning.
http://www.szabgab.com/blog/2008/04/1207076595.html
on Friday I'll finish at Linpro at 17:00 and then I'd be glad to join the
rest of you.
Gabor
Is there a W3C validator that works locally on my computer?
All the modules I found so far use the http://validator.w3.org/ service
including Test::HTML::W3C but that's not really usable in a frequently
running test suit.
There is Bundle::W3C::Validator that I think bundles all the modules need
Thanks.
Now I hope someone will package it as a module on CPAN :-)
Gabor
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, April 6, 2008 9:28 pm, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Is there a W3C validator that works locally on my computer?
All the modules I
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Fergal Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say put as much as possible of this outside the Test::
namespace and then wrap in a thin Test:: wrapper. I wish I'd done this
with Test::Deep, it's on the todo list but I'll never get around to
it,
I am not sure
installation?
regards
Gabor
--
Gabor Szabo
http://www.szabgab.com/
Hi Paul,
I am not sure if this was discussed already but while Test::Harness
3.10 passes its tests
on my Ubuntu 7.10 with perl 5.8.8 it fails when running with Devel::Cover:
Here is the beginning of the 2684 lines of output:
Deleting database
After running the following as I have been doing with many other modules
cover -delete
export
DEVEL_COVER_OPTIONS=-coverage,statement,branch,condition,path,subroutine,time
HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES=-MDevel::Cover make test
cover -report html
all tests PASS and then I get:
Can't open database
Yesterday I was happy to notice that you can use Test::Warn together with
Test::NoWarnings.
So you can test for a watning in a specific test while testing that
nothing else gives a warning.\
Good. :-)
Today I found out that if you skip_all tests while you have
Test::NoWarnings your test
will
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
