On Jun 08, 2006, at 17:34 , Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Which part should be fixed?
The limitation of the magic, namely
The key part is that magical auto-increment is defined earlier as
only working for strings matching /^[a-zA-Z]*[0-9]*\z/.
Which is described in Auto-increment and
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:56:13PM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
On Jun 08, 2006, at 17:34 , Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Which part should be fixed?
The limitation of the magic, namely
The key part is that magical auto-increment is defined earlier as
only working for strings matching
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:03:15PM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
I found that ('a'..'z') works only for alphanumerals. Try the code
below;
use strict;
use warnings;
#use utf8;
use charnames ':full';
binmode STDOUT, ':utf8';
# works
print $_\n for (\N{LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A} .. \N{LATIN
Dan Kogai schreef:
I found that ('a'..'z') works only for alphanumerals.
Just like it is documented. But your definition of 'alphanumeral'
is stale:
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Affijn, Ruud
Gewoon is een tijger.
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:03:42 +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
Sure, we can extend the magic to ensure that the increment of a
variable that holds \N{omega} is \N{alpha}\N{alpha}. But I feel
that dragons might be dormant here...
If is the ranges of greak letters to be
