Re: AL32UTF8

2004-05-01 Thread Lincoln A. Baxter
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 08:03, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:42:18PM -0400, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 11:16, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > Am I right in thinking that perl's internal utf8 representation > > > represents surrogates as a single (4 byte) code point and

Re: AL32UTF8

2004-05-01 Thread Owen Taylor
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 08:03, Tim Bunce wrote: > "You can use UTF8 and AL32UTF8 by setting NLS_LANG for OCI client > applications. If you do not need supplementary characters, then it > does not matter whether you choose UTF8 or AL32UTF8. However, if > your OCI applications might handle supplementa

Re: AL32UTF8

2004-05-01 Thread Lincoln A. Baxter
Hello Owen, On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 16:46, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 08:03, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > "You can use UTF8 and AL32UTF8 by setting NLS_LANG for OCI client > > applications. If you do not need supplementary characters, then it > > does not matter whether you choose UTF8 o

Re: AL32UTF8

2004-05-01 Thread Jungshik Shin
Tim Bunce wrote: On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 10:58:19PM +0700, Martin Hosken wrote: IIRC AL32UTF8 was introduced at the behest of Oracle (a voting member of Unicode) because they were storing higher plane codes using the surrogate pair technique of UTF-16 mapped into UTF-8 (i.e. resulting in 2 UTF