Re: de-utf8-ing a string

2007-10-18 Thread E R
On 10/17/07, Juerd Waalboer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: utf8::downgrade(); Thanks!

Re: good name for characters matching [^\0-\377]?

2007-10-18 Thread Martin Hosken
Dear Georg, Isn't it about time to find a good name for crippled character sets with ordinals below 256 only? Otherwise Unicode characters will continue to be considered the special case... Legacy encodings. Nicely derogatory and generally accepted. Yours, Martin

Re: good name for characters matching [^\0-\377]?

2007-10-18 Thread Juerd Waalboer
Georg Bauhaus skribis 2007-10-18 17:01 (+0200): Isn't it about time to find a good name for crippled character sets with ordinals below 256 only? These are single byte encodings. I prefer to add the word legacy too. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Kind regards, Korajn salutojn, Juerd Waalboer:

Re: good name for characters matching [^\0-\377]?

2007-10-18 Thread John Delacour
Juerd Waalboer wrote: E R skribis 2007-10-18 9:50 (-0500): I'm preparing a presentation about Perl and Unicode support, and I'd like to give a name for characters with ordinals above 255. Is there a good name for that class? They are characters outside the latin-1 range. Latin-1 has

Re: good name for characters matching [^\0-\377]?

2007-10-18 Thread E R
I should have added that in my presentation I am attempting to present Perl strings from a character set agnostic perspective. So, even though there is a strong bias for Perl to treat character ordinals 255 as Unicode code-points, I don't want people to automatically think Unicode when

Re: good name for characters matching [^\0-\377]?

2007-10-18 Thread Juerd Waalboer
E R skribis 2007-10-18 16:21 (-0500): I should have added that in my presentation I am attempting to present Perl strings from a character set agnostic perspective. That is silly, because Perl itself is not at all character set agnostic. It has unicode strings and it has binary strings, but