Win32::OLE and Visible property

2002-08-17 Thread Mark Veerman
Hello, I'm trying to create automation with Word with the Visible property set to 0. When I run the code with visible = 1, everything works as expected without errors. However, when I run the code with the visible = 0, I'm getting errors. Here's a snippet of code. my $WordFile = $doc_path\\ .

Re: Getting cgis to work

2002-08-17 Thread Carl Jolley
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, $Bill Luebkert wrote: Brian Steele wrote: Well lessee, choosing between one that automatically uses file association, and one that offers it as a configurable option (the result being that you'll find it enabled on some servers but not on others - great for

Re: Getting cgis to work

2002-08-17 Thread Carl Jolley
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, $Bill Luebkert wrote: Brian Steele wrote: Answers: 1. The reason why more IIS servers have been compromised than Apache servers has more to do with administration ignorance rather than anything else IMO. Ex: Nimda - MS had the fix out before Nimda arrived, but did

Re: Getting cgis to work

2002-08-17 Thread Carl Jolley
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Brian Steele wrote: The only problem with this analysis is that, based on the info I'm getting on my security lists these days, MORE bugs are being found now with open-source software than with MS software. It's just basic probability in action: New versions =

Re: Newbie: Faster way to do this and hash problem

2002-08-17 Thread Tim . Moose
You are looping over all of the %ext keys, and provided that $ext{$6} exists, assigning a value to $tad for each key. Therefore, the final value of $tad will always be the same, i.e. the one determined by the last key. foreach $key ( keys %ext ) {# if (exists

RE: Getting cgis to work

2002-08-17 Thread K. Brian Kelley
The point is that Apache is less prone to attack for some reason. Better initial coding possibly with fewer holes ?? With Apache there are seldom fixes going out since the initial code was written with security in mind. Rarely is it necessary to upgrade or patch for a security fix and

Re: IIS on win2k not liking PerlMagick

2002-08-17 Thread Carl Jolley
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, TC Winquist wrote: I'm using ImageMagick version 5.4.9 (I installed PerlMagick WITH ImageMagick), ActiveState ActivePerl version 5.6 on Win2k Adv Server running IIS 5.0. I'm trying to display an image using PerlMagick directly to a web browser (without saving the image

RE: IIS on win2k not liking PerlMagick

2002-08-17 Thread TC Winquist
If I replace 'gif:-' with 'png:-' (and change the header to png), I still get the same error. Some reason it doesn't like me writing the image to the browser. But it doesn't make sense that it works fine when running the perl script at the command prompt. Exception 425: An error has occurred

Spreadsheet::WriteExcel and set_bg_color();

2002-08-17 Thread Thoenen, Peter Mr. EPS
Anybody using Spreadsheet::WriteExcel and have gotten set_bg_color() to work with excel 2000? I can get all my formating options to work EXCEPT bg_color ... below is the code. Gone through the module site and no bugs are listed for this and don't perl well enough to even begin looking through

Re: IIS on win2k not liking PerlMagick

2002-08-17 Thread Sisyphus
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, TC Winquist wrote: I'm using ImageMagick version 5.4.9 (I installed PerlMagick WITH ImageMagick), ActiveState ActivePerl version 5.6 on Win2k Adv Server running IIS 5.0. I'm trying to display an image using PerlMagick directly to a web browser (without saving