Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:14:22 -0700
Subject: Re: Avoid using PL_na with newSVpv
From: j...@activestate.com
To: kaffeeti...@gmx.de
CC: perl-xs@perl.org
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Torsten Schoenfeld kaffeeti...@gmx.de
wrote:
Probably
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Torsten Schoenfeld kaffeeti...@gmx.de wrote:
newSVpv (string, PL_na) // do not do this
Is this recomended anywhere? PL_na is a legacy variable that used to
be used for
str = SvPV(sv, PL_na);
in case you don't care about the length of the string. Since
On 25.09.2013 20:56, Jan Dubois wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Torsten Schoenfeld
kaffeeti...@gmx.de wrote:
newSVpv (string, PL_na) // do not do this
Is this recomended anywhere?
Probably not. But http://grep.cpan.me/?q=newSVpv.*PL_na does show
quite a few hits, only roughly
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Torsten Schoenfeld kaffeeti...@gmx.de wrote:
Probably not. But http://grep.cpan.me/?q=newSVpv.*PL_na does show
quite a few hits, only roughly half of which are mine. Since the bugs
this causes are hard to diagnose, I thought a public service
announcement is
