Re: Sneak preview: Smoke 16864 /pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current

2002-05-30 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:32:12AM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: H.Merijn Brand wrote: Oops? There's a typo in change #16866. The first line of lib/File/stat.t is now 0#!./perl. Hence syntax errors and smoke failures. Gaak. Sorry about that. I have no idea how the '0' ended up in

Re: [PATCH pod/perlipc.pod] Handling the SIGHUP Signal in Daemons

2002-05-30 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Whether signal handlers need to reinstall themselves has historically always been OS-specific, and I don't think the safe signals changed that. POSIX signal handlers were defined to be auto-reinstalling. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use

[ID 20020530.001] Not OK: perl v5.8.0 +DEVEL16859 on MSWin32-x86-multi-thread 4.0 (UNINSTALLED)

2002-05-30 Thread Andreas Fehr
This is a build failure report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED], generated with the help of perlbug 1.33 running under perl v5.8.0. - [Please enter your report here] MingW32 2.95.3, WinNT4, SP6a Failed TestStat Wstat Total

RE: Improved $^X patch

2002-05-30 Thread Green, Paul
Benjamin, This info would be really helpful if added to perlport.pod...please consider submitting a patch. As it happens, on VOS we have both shell internal commands and VOS (OS) internal commands. The normal VOS OS-supplied command searching can find both internal and external OS commands,

RE: Improved $^X patch

2002-05-30 Thread Green, Paul
How about I just recognize VMS and skip the suffix hack? PG -Original Message- From: Craig A. Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Improved $^X patch At 5:32 PM -0400 5/30/02, [EMAIL

RE: Improved $^X patch

2002-05-30 Thread Green, Paul
What are you suggesting I do? PG -Original Message- From: Vadim Konovalov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 6:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Improved $^X patch I very dislike an advice to do