Re: 5.8.6

2004-11-28 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sun 28 Nov 2004 01:08, Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo, Pooh, said Piglet, giving a jump of surprise. I knew it was you. So did I,, said Pooh. What are you doing? I'm planting a haycorn, Pooh, so that it can grow up into an oak-tree, and have lots of haycorns

Re: 5.8.6

2004-11-28 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sun 28 Nov 2004 11:33, H.Merijn Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://opensource.fotango.com/~nclark/perl-5.8.6.tar.bz2 dor-5.8.6.diff uploaded to PAUSE. It includes the weakened err keyword All tests passed on Linux (and two weeks back also on HP-UX 11.00 and 11i)

Smoke [5.9.2] 23558 FAIL(c) bsd/os 4.1 (i386/1 cpu)

2004-11-28 Thread kane
Automated smoke report for 5.9.2 patch 23558 on bsd/os - 4.1 (i386/1 cpu) (fixit.xs4all.nl) using version Report by Test::Smoke v1.18.09 (perl 5.00503) [3 hours 3 minutes] O = OK F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom X = test(s) failed under TEST but not under harness ? = still running

5.8.6-dor on Cygwin

2004-11-28 Thread H.Merijn Brand
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- ../ext/Cwd/t/cwd.t1 256271 3.70% 21 io/tell.t281 3.57% 28 52 tests and 378 subtests skipped. Failed 2/909

./configure -DDEBUGGING not working?

2004-11-28 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, trying (for the first time) to compile a Perl with debugging for Devel::Leak: ./configure -Dusedevel -DDEBUGGING results in the output below. Do I need to do something special to get a debugging Perl? And where would I find out how? * ./configure

Re: ./configure -DDEBUGGING not working?

2004-11-28 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Tels wrote: trying (for the first time) to compile a Perl with debugging for Devel::Leak: ./configure -Dusedevel -DDEBUGGING The output from the smoke tests isn't exactly informative of how you really get it enabled. Do I need to do something

Re: ./configure -DDEBUGGING not working?

2004-11-28 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin Nicholas, On Sunday 28 November 2004 15:56, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Tels wrote: trying (for the first time) to compile a Perl with debugging for Devel::Leak: ./configure -Dusedevel -DDEBUGGING The output

Re: lib/ExtUtils/MANIFEST.SKIP is broken in 5.8.6

2004-11-28 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 09:40:31PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: *toot horns* *wave flags* 5.8.6 went out without this fix. :( http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/96177 The wrong MANIFEST.SKIP is used in lib/ExtUtils/MANIFEST.SKIP. This means folks using 5.8.6 running

Re: share() producing empty hash

2004-11-28 Thread Nigel Sandever
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 04:41:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael G Schwern) wrote: With Test::More 0.50 and threads I get an odd error using skip and threads. [~/tmp/Test-Simple-0.50] perl5.8.5 -Ilib -wle 'use threads; use Test::More no_plan; pass(foo); SKIP: { skip this, 1 }' ok 1 - foo

[perl #32671] OK: perl v5.8.6 on i386-linux-thread-multi 2.6.8-1.521

2004-11-28 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Johan Vromans # Please include the string: [perl #32671] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32671 This is a success report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED], generated with the

Re: share() producing empty hash

2004-11-28 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 11:17:40PM +, Nigel Sandever wrote: This is the same bug/limitation of threads::shared I reported in perlbug #30702. Then, it was essentially dismissed as being working as designed: Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: When I 1st did the coding for sharing there was a

Re: share() producing empty hash

2004-11-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 11:17:40PM +, Nigel Sandever wrote: This is the same bug/limitation of threads::shared I reported in perlbug #30702. Then, it was essentially dismissed as being working as designed: If so then the design sucks. I would like to know what it is that I'm doing

Re: share() producing empty hash

2004-11-28 Thread Nigel Sandever
29/11/2004 01:47:33, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 11:17:40PM +, Nigel Sandever wrote: This is the same bug/limitation of threads::shared I reported in perlbug # 30702. Then, it was essentially dismissed as being working as designed: If so then the

Re: share() producing empty hash

2004-11-28 Thread Nigel Sandever
29/11/2004 01:06:13, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 11:17:40PM +, Nigel Sandever wrote: This is the same bug/limitation of threads::shared I reported in perlbug # 30702. Then, it was essentially dismissed as being working as designed: Nick

Re: share() producing empty hash

2004-11-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 02:41:24AM -, Nigel Sandever wrote: I don't think that you are doing anything wrong. I have *never* seen share() return a reference to a hash or an array that had contents. That is to say, whenever you pass a reference to a hash or any array that hash something in

[ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder 0.52

2004-11-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.52.tar.gz or http://mungus.schwern.org/svn/CPAN/Test-Simple/tags/VERSION=0.52 or svn://mungus.schwern.org/CPAN/Test-Simple/tags/VERSION=0.52 or a CPAN near you This is the one bug release. There's one bug left in the RT queue (everything else is

Re: share() producing empty hash

2004-11-28 Thread Nigel Sandever
29/11/2004 03:02:08, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 02:41:24AM -, Nigel Sandever wrote: I don't think that you are doing anything wrong. I have *never* seen share() return a reference to a hash or an array that had contents. That is to say, whenever

Cwd.pm File::Spec - CPAN (test request)

2004-11-28 Thread Ken Williams
Hi, I've uploaded PathTools 3.01_02, a release candidate for 3.02, to CPAN. It includes File::Spec and Cwd. Testing reports are appreciated. Changes since 3.01: - Fixed a testing bug in which sometimes the wrong version of Cwd (the version already installed on the user's machine) would get

Re: share() producing empty hash

2004-11-28 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 04:26:36AM -, Nigel Sandever wrote: Ah but...that same POD also says: Note that if this module is imported when threads has not yet been loaded, then these functions all become no-ops. This makes it possible to write modules that will work in