IO::Select-select gives no way to detect a timeout.
Both timeout and error return the same values.
Timeout should return an array with three undef
entries.
The documentation for IO::Select-select does not document
what the return value will be after a timeout.
David Austin
---
[EMAIL
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:15:58PM +0100, Salvador Fandiño wrote:
Hi,
Nicholas Clark wrote:
Now that the assertion code is (I believe) fully feature complete, I'm
wondering if it can be refactored into a minimal set of core hooks, and an
XS module in ext. Having more hooks increases what
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:01:20AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:23 -0700, Shaun Daredia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to compile perl5.004_05 under SLES9 SP2 and I am seeing the
following message.
make: *** No rule to make target `built-in', needed by
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 05:18:04 -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:01:20AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:23 -0700, Shaun Daredia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am trying to compile perl5.004_05 under SLES9 SP2 and I am
Automated smoke report for 5.9.3 patch 25417
profane.mongueurs.net: Intel Pentium III Xeon (i386/6 cpu)
onfreebsd - 5.4-STABLE
using cc version 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728
smoketime 5 hours 19 minutes (average 31 minutes 56 seconds)
Summary: FAIL(F)
O = OK F = Failure(s),
I think we had said we could always keep useperlio for blead smokes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Automated smoke report for 5.9.3 patch 25417
profane.mongueurs.net: Intel Pentium III Xeon (i386/6 cpu)
onfreebsd - 5.4-STABLE
using cc version 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
I think we had said we could always keep useperlio for blead smokes.
ignore these reports. I was syncing from the wrong repository.
David
Steve == Steve Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve I've seen this issue elsewhere but haven't caught whether the
Steve problem is with the default Perl installed on OS X 10.4, or if
Steve this is a freshly built maint. Which are you seeing this on?
Steve The actually cause of the problem
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:44:27AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Yeah, so that's the problem. I install a new Perl, it installs the
non-XS version of Scalar::Util. Then I can't install Storable (or
many other things) because they say weak isn't supported. Sure,
installing Scalar::Util
Syncs core with CPAN
Paul
zlib-1.39.patch
Description: Binary data
Nicholas == Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicholas And the bug report for the distributor of the perl you
Nicholas installed would be why isn't it installing the XS version
Nicholas of a core module? ?
What do you mean distributor of the perl you installed? Joking, right?
I've said
This Week on perl5-porters (5-11 September 2005)
The Return of the perl5-porters Summaries
Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni, Adriano Ferreira and David Landgren have
stepped up to the plate to bring you the weekly p5p summaries. We make
no promises as to how long we can keep this up, but we'll
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 02:28:20PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Nicholas == Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nicholas And the bug report for the distributor of the perl you
Nicholas installed would be why isn't it installing the XS version
Nicholas of a core module? ?
What do
# New Ticket Created by Jim McKim
# Please include the string: [perl #37183]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37183
This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
generated with the help of
# New Ticket Created by David Ljung Madison
# Please include the string: [perl #37186]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37186
This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
generated with the
Returns the new number of elements in the array.
I believe that should be interpreted the new (total) number of elements
in the array
rather than the new number of elements added to the array.
--
Charles DeRykus
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:38:41PM -0700, David Ljung Madison wrote:
The return value for push is the total number of elements in the array.
According to the docs, push:
Returns the new number of elements in the array.
Example code:
my @j = (1..100);
print push(@j,42), \n;
On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:38 PM, David Ljung Madison (via RT) wrote:
The return value for push is the total number of elements in the array.
According to the docs, push:
Returns the new number of elements in the array.
Right -- the new number of elements, as opposed to the number of new
John E. Malmberg wrote:
Paul Marquess wrote:
Editing 16oneshot.t to remove the './' from the $tmpdir and re-running
the script makes it pass all 2544 tests.
It appears something is wrong with glob() on VMS.
glob(./tmpdir/a*.tmp) is returning t/tmpdir/a1.tmp when the current
working
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John E. Malmberg wrote:
Paul Marquess wrote:
Editing 16oneshot.t to remove the './' from the $tmpdir and re-running
the script makes it pass all 2544 tests.
I've removed the leading './' from the all the $tmpdir directory variables
in
Nicholas Clark wrote:
With respect to the odd corruption seen previously on VMS, but now no longer
visible, might this patch have had something to do with it? I believe that
the change I made was correct. If so, then because it removed a large over-
allocation, it will show up any other code
At 7:36 PM -0400 9/16/05, John E. Malmberg wrote:
John E. Malmberg wrote:
It appears something is wrong with glob() on VMS.
glob(./tmpdir/a*.tmp) is returning t/tmpdir/a1.tmp when the current
working directory is t.
glob(tmpdir/a*.tmp) is returning tmpdir/a1.tmp as expected.
I will need to
John E. Malmberg wrote:
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:33:45PM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
I can change the test to write to a tied filehandle or I can make sure
the
new Test::Builder object which outputs to some_file is destroyed before I
read from some_file. The
Paul Marquess wrote:
According to your previous post that means that the only thing left failing
is one test in globmapper.t
ext/Compress/Zlib/t/globmapper.t 68 of 69 ok
That was a typo, there are only 68 tests in globmapper and they are all
working for me on VMS now.
-John
[EMAIL
Craig A. Berry wrote:
At 7:36 PM -0400 9/16/05, John E. Malmberg wrote:
John E. Malmberg wrote:
It appears something is wrong with glob() on VMS.
glob(./tmpdir/a*.tmp) is returning t/tmpdir/a1.tmp
when the current working directory is t.
glob(tmpdir/a*.tmp) is returning tmpdir/a1.tmp as
David Landgren wrote:
This Week on perl5-porters (5-11 September 2005)
The Return of the perl5-porters Summaries
This summary was written by David Landgren.
Nicely done!... I did miss these!
--
END
What doesn't kill us can
On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:31 PM, David Landgren wrote:
This Week on perl5-porters (5-11 September 2005)
The Return of the perl5-porters Summaries
Hooray! Thanks for doing!
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Sep 17, 2005, at 12:55 , Andy Lester wrote:
On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:31 PM, David Landgren wrote:
This Week on perl5-porters (5-11 September 2005)
The Return of the perl5-porters Summaries
Hooray! Thanks for doing!
Ditto. Thank you!
Dan the Perl5 Porter
28 matches
Mail list logo
