On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 04:10:41PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 10:02:19AM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
They're mostly the same errors as blead had around patch 24079
(etc) when Andy started adding const to blead.
I'm hoping that as I work through them most of the
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 04:09:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
The problem with the construct '([^\\]|\\.)*' is that on each character,
there are three options to take: match it with '[^\\]', match it with
'\\.',
Ping?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 06:45:56PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
--- perl/embed.fnc.orig 2005-09-19 12:16:55.0 -0700
+++ perl/embed.fnc2005-09-21 13:05:46.76224 -0700
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@
p|int|yywarn |NN const char* s
#if defined(MYMALLOC
--- perl/embed.fnc.orig 2005-09-19 12:16:55.0 -0700
+++ perl/embed.fnc 2005-09-21 13:05:46.76224 -0700
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@
p |int|yywarn |NN const char* s
#if defined(MYMALLOC)
Ap |void |dump_mstats|NN char* s
-ApR|int|get_mstats |NN
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:31:19PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Merijn notices this line in 5.8.x in S_new_logop
if ((type == OP_AND) == (SvTRUE(((SVOP*)first)-op_sv))) {
It's wonky. It seems to be wrong. But it's been that way since 5.8.0 started.
The corresponding point in blead is
Tim O'Reilly says we can say:
--- perl/pod/perlglossary.pod.orig 2005-09-20 11:22:31.480172800 -0700
+++ perl/pod/perlglossary.pod 2005-09-20 11:24:18.453993600 -0700
@@ -3380,4 +3380,4 @@
Based on the Glossary of Programming Perl, Third Edition,
by Larry Wall, Tom Christiansen Jon
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 9/20/05, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim O'Reilly says we can say:
Woot. Where ?
See attached.
--- perl/pod/perlglossary.pod.orig 2005-09-20 11:22:31.480172800 -0700
+++ perl/pod
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:58:55PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:11:36AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I just tried to build bleadperl and got this:
Is this still a problem?
No, it vanished as mysteriously as it arrived.
I see Nicholas Clark has been hard at work integrating patches into
perl5.8.x. Trying a build on cygwin at patch 25494 passes all tests
except for op/layers.t, which should be fixed once 24764 is
integrated.
It would be nice if the version number could be bumped to 5.8.8 soon;
I inadvertently
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 11:07:50AM +0200, Jos I. Boumans wrote:
On Sep 14, 2005, at 1:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Automated smoke report for 5.9.3 patch 25409
fixit.xs4all.nl: Pentium II (i386/1 cpu)
onbsd/os - 4.1
using cc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314 (egcs-1.1.2
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:31:53AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Randal == Randal L Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com writes:
Nicholas == Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've said maintperl a few times already.
Nicholas No, I'm not, in as much as I don't understand why the perl
bleadperl is getting:
DProf.xs:140: warning: `unused' attribute ignored
The following fixes it; I thought about defining a pTHX_bare in
perl.h that leaves off the register and PERL_UNUSED_DECL from pTHX,
but decided there really wasn't going to be a lot of other demand
for it. The aTHX would
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:01:20AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:21:23 -0700, Shaun Daredia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to compile perl5.004_05 under SLES9 SP2 and I am seeing the
following message.
make: *** No rule to make target `built-in', needed by
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:10:20AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 9/5/05, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other feedback on making
(LIST)[LIST]-
not need the -?
I think I
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:41:36PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:07:11AM -0700, japhy @ perlmonk. org wrote:
In 'perlref', item #3 of 'Using References' says
One more thing here. The arrow is optional between brackets sub-
scripts, so you can
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:41:56PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 9/5/05, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other feedback on making
(LIST)[LIST]-
not need the -?
I think I like the idea, and the patch seems safe. What I don't like,
though, is the lack
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:41:36PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
BTW, cygwin only has bison 1.875b, not the allowed 1.875 or 1.875c,
but it seemed to work. I also note that Debian stable has 1.875d;
would it make sense to just allow any 1.875* version?
--- p/regen_perly.pl.orig
Trimmed the cc list a little.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:10:36PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:58:49PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I wouldn't really like to venture what the correct fix is, epecially as
I'm still consfused about the meanings
I've used code like:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
my $str = 'NATCGATCG';
my @substr = qw(ATCG ATCG);
my $id = -1;
foreach (@substr)
{
$id = index($str, $_, $id);
print $id\n;
$id += length($_);
}
before, but just now noticed
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:07:11AM -0700, japhy @ perlmonk. org wrote:
In 'perlref', item #3 of 'Using References' says
One more thing here. The arrow is optional between brackets sub-
scripts, so you can shrink the above down to
$array[$x]{foo}[0] = January;
This led me to
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:20:07PM -0400, Rick Delaney wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:41:36PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:07:11AM -0700, japhy @ perlmonk. org wrote:
sub foo { ...; return @data }
my $x = (foo())[0][1];
which would
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:09:41PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:20:07PM -0400, Rick Delaney wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 05:41:36PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:07:11AM -0700, japhy @ perlmonk. org wrote:
sub foo
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:19:11PM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:25:24PM +0200, Marcus Holland-Moritz wrote:
I think this is a bug in Perl itself that was introduced with
5.8.0 and is still present. It can be cut down to this code:
#!perl -wl
use Tie::Hash;
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:58:49PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I wouldn't really like to venture what the correct fix is, epecially as
I'm still consfused about the meanings of the public verses private N/I/P
flags.
I *think* I understand it, and magic values shouldn't get
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:46:46PM -0700, mohammad yaseen wrote:
when you run the command given below
perl -I../lib -MO=Concise,BEGIN,CHECK,INIT,END,-exec -e '$a=$b print
q/foo/'
Also with just: perl -I../lib -MO=Concise,BEGIN,-exec -e0
As instructed, Concise is dumping out the BEGIN
Can you tell us what your goal is?
I just tried to build bleadperl and got this:
Making DynaLoader (static_pic)
Writing Makefile for DynaLoader
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/sthoenna/bleadperl/p/ext/DynaLoader'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/sthoenna/bleadperl/p/ext/DynaLoader'
make[1]: Entering directory
Anybody else seeing this? I'm on cygwin, [EMAIL PROTECTED] now.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:11:36AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I just tried to build bleadperl and got this:
Making DynaLoader (static_pic)
Writing Makefile for DynaLoader
make[1]: Entering directory `/home
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:07:48PM -0700, Gerrit P. Haase via RT wrote:
Hmm, was still logged in as guest...
It is a local patch anyway, I add the Win32CORE part and some more Win32
related stuff. This should go back into the source anyway.
Mea culpa. I've been meaning to get around to
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:29:04PM -0400, Rick Delaney wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:29:42AM -0700, Chris wrote:
Calls to system() in a forked child always return -1 if the parent has
set SIG{CHLD}='IGNORE'. I would expect/hope it to return 0.
Demonstrated by:
perl -e
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:28:30AM -0700, Eugene Morozov wrote:
I'm attaching single script and a test data file. This script hangs on
regexp match, though I think it shouldn't.
It doesn't hang if it's run in untainted mode, or study is commented.
Confirmed in [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Dr shows
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:43:03AM -0400, Rick Delaney wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:30:41PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:35:49PM -0700, Chris Unger wrote:
my @array = (1, 2); # this means $#array is set to 1
for $i ($value1
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:51:09AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
Dave Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:19:16PM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
Hi,
Here's a test on perl-5.8.6 run on z/OS :
$a = '0178';
$b = '00FF';
$a1 = pack(U0U*, hex $a);
$b1 =
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On 8/18/05, Peter Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This recently bit me:
$ perl -wle 'print 42 if defined($h{foo}++)'
42
Now, before thousands of you reach for the flamethrowers, yes, I know
- now - that this is
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:23:18PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I remember a borderline acerbic discussion here; perhaps someone could
read the archives and summarize what was said, rather than everyone
restating the same opinions?
This discussion
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 09:27:50AM -0400, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:58:55PM -0700, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
This program generates the following output:
Bareword found where operator expected at /tmp/bug.pl line 4, near
$O Data::Dumper
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:35:49PM -0700, Chris Unger wrote:
Perl 5.8.4 (also same output with Perl 5.8.7):
Loop 1:
Loop 2: 0
Loop 2: 1
Code:
#!/usr/local/perl5/bin/perl
my @array = (1, 2); # this means $#array is set to 1
for $i ($value1..$#array) { # note
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 04:15:56PM +1000, Sisyphus wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 2:24 PM
Subject: Ping? [PATCH] Re: [perl #36654] Inconsistent treatment of NaN
Can
Can the patches in:
http://nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/103801
and
http://nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/103906
be applied (or receive feedback)? Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:09:56AM -0400, John Malmberg wrote:
John E. Malmberg wrote:
This patch fixes configure.com on VMS to add the sig_count parameter.
This allows the ext/posix/t/sigaction.t script to run with out errors on
VMS.
An updated patch for configure.com will be posted
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 02:16:21PM +0200, Piotr Fusik wrote:
Hello,
I thought that 32 is simply an empty string, but it appears to be something
different:
perl -le print '' eq (32)
1
perl -le print 'a'|''
a
perl -le print 'a'|(32)
0
It has a string value of and a numeric value
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 04:58:53PM +0200, Dominic Dunlop wrote:
Following on from perlbug #36676, which concerned perl's handling of
a peculiarity of IEEE-standard floating point, I've attached a patch
that creates a new test script, op/t/ieeefp.t:
# ieeefp.t
#
# Tests IEEE
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:05:20AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
The PERL_PRESERVE_IVUV stuff can lose a negative zero.
$ perl -we'$x = -.0; $x *= 1.0; print $x'
0
$ perl -we'$x = -.0; $x *= 1.1; print $x'
-0
Should a negative zero never get IOK turned on?
I meant to show
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:31:11AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:05:20AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
The PERL_PRESERVE_IVUV stuff can lose a negative zero.
$ perl -we'$x = -.0; $x *= 1.0; print $x'
0
$ perl -we'$x = -.0; $x *= 1.1; print $x
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 11:03:08AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:27:36PM -0700, Sisyphus wrote:
use warnings;
my $z = NaN;
$z += 1;
print $z, \n;
__END__
When I run that I get an output of simply:
1
NaN + 1 should be NaN, not 1
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 05:43:08PM -0500, David Nicol wrote:
On 7/28/05, John P. Linderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any significant difference between perl and Perl?
That is exactly the sort of edge case that is under discussion in
this thread. One possibility is maintaining an
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 02:37:01AM -0700, Harald Joerg wrote:
perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e xsinit -- -o perlxsi.c
...has problems if perl has been built with a static extension
provided in a hints file.
In the cygwin hints file for perl 5.8.7, after applying the
patches from the
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 12:41:34PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
I have the idea that the Encode part should be Cc's to Dan K, but this file
is not mentioned in Maintainers.pl
'Encode' =
{
'MAINTAINER'= 'dankogai',
'FILES' = q[ext/Encode],
'CPAN'
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:37:44PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Simply choosing a bigger (well, more negative) number than -3600 in the
test above also works, e.g. -7200 gives the correct result for GMT+1 but
fails for GMT+2, etc. So using -50400 (-3600 * 14) should also do the
trick.
There is
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:38:11PM +0200, Piotr Fusik wrote:
+A program that compiles and usually executes L/Perl scripts. Or is
+that Lperlfaq1/Is it a Perl program or a Perl script?|Perl programs?
s/is that/are they/, I guess, but I may be wrong...
Implied is that phrase in the previous
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 08:43:41AM +0200, Dominic Dunlop wrote:
Pumpking(s), please don't apply my patch, as it may be unsafe despite
getting through the test suite:
On 2005?08?05, at 01:46, Dave Mitchell wrote:
Perl_peep doesn't just do omptimisations; swome stuff is necessary for
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:25:33AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
./miniperl -w -Ilib -MExporter -e '?' || gmake minitest
./miniperl -Ilib configpm configpm.tmp
Malformed UTF-8 character (unexpected continuation
byte 0x54, with no preceding start byte) in printf at
configpm line 63.
Malformed
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:22:59PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Whoever does maintenance tends to be drawn from someone who has already
been committing to the development branch. I think that this would be more
help would be useful. Actually merging across patches is relatively
^than ??
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:08:13PM -0500, Troy Loveday wrote:
Gurusamy,
Ilya Martynov is now the Data::Dumper maintainer.
I have observed what I consider to be a bug in XS (C) implementation of
Data::Dumper (the Perl implementation does not exhibit the problem).
Problem: With Sortkeys(1),
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:27:36PM -0700, Sisyphus wrote:
use warnings;
my $z = NaN;
$z += 1;
print $z, \n;
__END__
When I run that I get an output of simply:
1
NaN + 1 should be NaN, not 1. If NaN is treated as a string, then
you would expect a value of 1 - but if NaN were
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:35:13AM -0700, rajarshi das wrote:
Nicholas Clark wrote:
If you put those 3 bytes directly between the '{' and '}' characters in
the EBCDIC version of that 1 liner, does it also print 3500?
I am unable to put those three bytes in the 1-liner you mentioned above,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:53:12PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:43:19PM -0700, Piotr Fusik wrote:
The result of the unary minus operator, when applied to
an undefined value (e.g. undefined variable) is unexpected:
perl -le 'print for -0,-,-0.0,-undef'
0
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Graham Barr wrote:
I don't think its a bug so much as undocumented behaviour. fixing it
would involve doing a whole bunch of unneccessary copying in sort and
grep.
And reverse and any XS sub that directly returns any of its
SV arguments (eg
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:27:51AM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:42:11PM -, philippe. cote @ usherbrooke. ca
wrote:
sv_rvweaken doesn't handle tied variables
Proof :
+-+
Sample
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 11:38:05AM +0900, SADAHIRO Tomoyuki wrote:
Hello,
\c\ is an only case (afaik) of escape sequence ending with backslash.
Though perlop explains how to find the end of quoted constructs
in detail, it may be a trap.
Regards,
SADAHIRO Tomoyuki
diff -ur
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:48:10PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 22:05:13 +0900, SADAHIRO Tomoyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
generated with the help of perlbug 1.35 running under perl v5.8.4.
I ran into this,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 02:08:07PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
I think the thing to do is to reword the first statement such that it no
longer declares our has no effect unless strict is on.
When Cuse strict vars is in effect, the Cour declaration lets you
use the declared global
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:22:02PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
So I've applied your patch, together with my test (marked as TODO since
it currently fails) as change 25083. Note that it is all one test,
though, so the newly fixed bit isn't actually being tested until the
TODO gets resolved :-(
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:22:02PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
So I've applied your patch, together with my test (marked as TODO since
it currently fails) as change 25083. Note that it is all one
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:45:51AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:22:02PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
So I've applied your patch, together with my test (marked
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 03:05:00PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:45:51AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:22:02PM +0100, Steve
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:17:34AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have always favoured I$variable because I used to be recommended
for variables in perlpod.pod (used for emphasis or variables), but I
see that change 12542 reworded the description for I as
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:34:33PM -, abigail @ abigail. nl wrote:
I've confirmed the bug to be present in 5.000, 5.004_0[45], 5.005_0x,
5.6.x and 5.8.x, including 5.8.7. However, the bug isn't present in
any of the 5.9.x versions of perl.
I think this was fixed by the removal of the
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:19:25AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 09:22:13PM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
What do I have to do special to make my replies to old bugs in rt.perl.org
show up on p5p like Steve's do?
Put p5p (well, the email address) in the CC line
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:57:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Automated smoke report for 5.9.3 patch 25055
fixit.xs4all.nl: Pentium II (i386/1 cpu)
onbsd/os - 4.1
using cc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:50:17AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:12:03AM -0400, Scott R. Godin wrote:
I was surprised to find that Date::Parse actually had these value limits
hard-coded into itself and wasn't utilizing the underlying library
functions to
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:52:00AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:10:14AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Start here:
Really I'd have to start here:
http://www.dummies.com/WileyCDA/DummiesTitle/productCd-0764570684.html
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:55:15AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Steve Hay wrote:
My test POD is attached, together with the old HTML output
(without your patch) and the new (with your patch).
Thanks for coming up with tests for this.
The POD made it through, but the HTML's seem to have got
--- perl/lib/Pod/Html.pm.orig 2005-05-05 08:46:10.0 -0700
+++ perl/lib/Pod/Html.pm 2005-07-04 00:06:33.823966400 -0700
@@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@
my( $url );
my $fid = fragment_id( $item );
-if( defined( $page ) ){
+if( defined( $page ) $page ne ){
# we have
Remove the =head1 Terms, add =head2 jump points.
--- perl/pod/perlglossary.pod 2005-07-01 06:13:30.0 -0700
+++ perlpatch/pod/perlglossary.pod 2005-07-03 23:58:29.147035000 -0700
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Lhttp://foldoc.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/index.html, the Jargon File
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote:
Whilst I'm here, when I do get around to posting a beta on CPAN, I'd prefer
it doesn't get used in anger until it has bedded-in. If I give the module a
version number like 2.000_00, will the CPAN shell ignore it?
This is often done
BTW, Pod::Html is *not* a dual life module. Please don't wait for the CPAN
maintainer to apply this; there isn't one.
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 02:07:38AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
--- perl/lib/Pod/Html.pm.orig 2005-05-05 08:46:10.0 -0700
+++ perl/lib/Pod/Html.pm 2005
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 09:18:41AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
I'm glad that we understand each other now, but I still disagree. I've
applied change 25033 using the #ifdef for Borland.
No problem; it's your call to make.
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:23:29AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
+
+Descriptive editing term--short for awkward. Also coincidentally
+refers to a venerable text-processing language from which Perl derived
+some of its high-level ideas.
+
+=back 4
+
+=over 4
+
+=item
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:11:00PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Here's a first try at perlglossary.pod, mostly taken from the Camel
III Glossary courtesy of the nice folks at O'Reilly. Their lawyers
are still working out the exact licensing wording
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 10:16:19AM -0400, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:10:50AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
+=item accessor methods
+
+A Cmethod used to indirectly inspect or update an Cobject's
+state (its Cinstance variables).
Why have all
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:24:06AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Mike Guy wrote:
Steve Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Does anyone else see several dozen
warning: #pragma system_header ignored outside include file
warnings when building Errno with gcc?
I see it on Win32 (MinGW -- gcc
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 10:43:12AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:11:00PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Here's a first try at perlglossary.pod, mostly taken from the Camel
III Glossary courtesy of the nice folks
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:04:18PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Exporter will load Exporter::Heavy if it sees *any* sigils in the @EXPORT
list. This includes foo. foo is equivalent to foo and can be
processed the same. This patch simply strips off any leading before
Exporter does its
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:46:19AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
win32/win32.c currently generates warnings under gcc. The problem is
reproduced by:
#include process.h
int main() {
const char *cmdname;
const char *const *argv;
return execv(cmdname, (char *const *)argv);
}
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:33:50AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:46:19AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
win32/win32.c currently generates warnings under gcc. The problem is
reproduced by:
#include process.h
int main() {
const char
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:41:37AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
And the table shows that assigning
a const char * const [] to a char * const [] is not valid.
Err, I meant assigning a char * const [] to a const char * const []
(i.e. using the cast in MinGW).
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:22:46AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
But what do you mean by correctly? You seem to be meaning what SUSv3
says, whereas I would have thought that correct for a given compiler
is whatever that compiler's headers say.
You're right that it doesn't hurt (and doesn't
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:43:33AM -0400, John Peacock wrote:
p.s. is this _really_ necessary:
if (name[1] == '_'
name[2] == 'P'
name[3] == 'A'
name[4] == 'C'
name[5] == 'K'
name[6] == 'A'
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:35:49PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 05:10:02AM +0400, Alexey Tourbin wrote:
+} or do {
+require DynaLoader;
+local @ISA = qw(DynaLoader);
+bootstrap Storable $VERSION;
+};
1;
__END__
#
End of patch
Since
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 08:33:34PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
On Apr 12, 2005 8:24 PM, Dave Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) add a negative voice class method: CLONE_ME_NOT (or whatever wording)
and do cloning unless CLONE_ME_NOT exists and returns true:
+ makes the
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:44:30AM -, Piotr Fusik wrote:
gt; + $x = 1 for $[ = 0;
gt; + pass('optimized assignment to $[ used to segfault in scalar
context');
gt; + if (($[) = 0) { $x = 1 }
gt; + pass('optimized assignment to $[ used to segfault in list
context');
gt;
gt; Looks
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 03:52:26PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
Those are expected. Unfortunately, it's a case where gcc has an
optimization that always triggers a warning; there's no way to write
the code (AFAIK) to get the
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:37:30PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
../lib/Test/Harness/t/strap-analyze.t...FAILED at test 19
../lib/Test/Harness/t/test-harness.tFAILED at test 13
make test:
lib/Test/Harness/t/strap-analyze..Can't locate if.pm in @INC (@INC
contains:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:39:29PM -, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jun 23 04:38:19 2002]:
I am using the Find::Find routine to scan a tree of files. It has
worked fine until I tried something on a PC
find ( $routine_ref , directory ) is the form a use.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:49:16PM -0500, Steve Peters wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:24:44AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:39:29PM -, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
I was not able to duplicate your problem with either Perl 5.8.6 or
5.6.1. It appears
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:41:34AM +0200, demerphq wrote:
On 6/16/05, Mark Jason Dominus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yves:
Using UNIVERSAL::isa() is IMO bad as its suseptible to
my $obj=3Dbless [],'HASH';
type nonsense.
Perhaps, but it seems to me that someone doing that is
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:51:44AM -, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Oct 23 07:07:01 2003]:
This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
generated with the help of perlbug 1.34 running under perl v5.8.1.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:34:01PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:18:36PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
Looks like VIM formatting codes. *HI!!*
Yes, and they've been added in regularly for at least the past month.
Added or slipped in?
Do we want to be
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:49:59AM -, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Hash assignment (%foo = %bar) is one of the few parts of the perl core that
uses hv_store, instead of hv_fetch.
If you assign to a tied hash, then the current implementation of hv_store
erroneously also stores the new contents
1 - 100 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
