Re: [perl #32884] API doc for SvUTF8

2005-09-12 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Steve Peters via RT wrote: Acutally, everything looking a return value from SvFLAGS(sv) should be looking for a U32. Since I'd like to automate these changes as much as possible, how does the following look? Fine, but probably all other docs for SvFLAGS bit tests need the same change, no ?

Re: [perl #32884] API doc for SvUTF8

2005-09-12 Thread Steve Peters
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:41:23PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: Steve Peters via RT wrote: Acutally, everything looking a return value from SvFLAGS(sv) should be looking for a U32. Since I'd like to automate these changes as much as possible, how does the following look? Fine,

[perl #32884] API doc for SvUTF8

2005-09-10 Thread Steve Peters via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Dec 05 18:25:51 2004]: This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED], generated with the help of perlbug 1.35 running under perl v5.8.4. - [Please enter your report here] The doc for

[perl #32884] API doc for SvUTF8

2004-12-06 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Please include the string: [perl #32884] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32884 This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED], generated with the

Re: [perl #32884] API doc for SvUTF8

2004-12-06 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:25:52AM -, perl-5. 8. 0 @ ton. iguana. be wrote: things fail badly because (at least on my system) the bool enum becomes a char, and since SVf_UTF8 is 0x2000, utf8 will always be 0 after truncate. Either the docs or the macro should be updated I think I