Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Object Freezing
[ ... ]
... The upshot is that we're doing it Dan's way; Glorious Leader
continues to trump Pumpking Patchmonster.
As this is a summary, abbove sentence is a summary as well. The reality
is more complex. The final implementation
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do worry about some long-running daemon that uses anonymous classes
heavily. It's possible that after quite some time, we'd run out of
integers,
Its the same problem as assigning PIDs to a process. We will have to
cycle around and reuse old free numbers
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
src\jit_cpu.c(95) : error C2065: 'RTYPE_COM' : undeclared identifier
Did you recheck that recently, I had committed a change WRT this.
NMAKE : warning U4006: special macro undefined : '$'
link -dll -def:libparrot.def -nologo -debug -o
- Original Message -
From: Lars Balker Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Juergen Boemmels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [perl #24333] [PATCH] pthreads configure on FreeBSD
Juergen Boemmels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars
As originally proposed by Melvin Smith, we gonna have a Halloween
release. Its not so much Nothing fancy, just something fun. :) - A
lot of things did happen since the last release. Not really milestones,
though - nevertheless the rather big list of improvements[1] justifies a
release.
*
Some of patches on that list that are mine.
#24030 Obsolete
#24038 Obsolete
#24043 Applied
#24063 Applied
#24177 Rejected
#24188 Applied
I tried to update the status of #24177 but got Permission Denied.
Any chance of that being changed so I could update them myself?
Mike
On Wednesday, Oct 22,
Nick Kostirya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise, it would be necessary to introduce the idea of 'headers that
are
required for testing a header'.
After a test you have the result in $PConfig{whatever}, so you can
adjust the next test according to the results of the previous one.
leo
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t\src\extend.t1 256121 8.33% 11
I've committed a change for extend_11 (I did print to
Hey,
Attached is a small patchlet, that allows the following code to execute:
.pcc_sub _main prototyped
.sym PerlUndef a
a = new PerlUndef
a = 10 + 5
print a
.end
And avoids having to instead do:
.pcc_sub _main prototyped
.sym PerlUndef a
a = new
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #24341]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24341
The new classes/null.pl was trying to return 0 from a void function. The
problem
Hi,
I'm writing on behalf of Ottawa Perl Mongers. At our last meeting, one of
our members gave us a quick introduction to the Phalanx project and its
goals. A number of the members were interested in the idea and we have been
looking for a group project. How would we go about getting involved?
Use your test script as the MTA (instead of sendmail/qmail-inject/etc.)?
Print the oks from your pseudo-MTA.
--
Gordon Henriksen
IT Manager
ICLUBcentral Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Stosberg
Sent: Tuesday, October
Tim Bunce said:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:17:24PM -0500, Michael Carman wrote:
I've included a patch for Devel/Cover/DB.pm in case someone else wants
to try it. It has *not* been sanctioned by Paul (though he's welcome to
it) so use at your own risk. Obviously, the file format for the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I ran some more tests, some of which might be more significant:
time(sec) db size (kB)peak RAM (MB)
no coverage 15 --- ~ 10
Data::Dumper+eval246 245 ~ 23.4
Storable 190
Jeays, Mark wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing on behalf of Ottawa Perl Mongers. At our last meeting, one of
our members gave us a quick introduction to the Phalanx project and its
goals. A number of the members were interested in the idea and we have been
looking for a group project. How would we go
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[snipped Devel::Cover metrics]
Thanks. This is interesting.
Was this using all the coverage criteria?
Looking back at my test harness... no, it's just the heavy stuff that
I find most useful: statement, branch, and condition
--- Jeays, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing on behalf of Ottawa Perl Mongers. At our last meeting, one of
our members gave us a quick introduction to the Phalanx project and its
goals. A number of the members were interested in the idea and we have been
looking for a group
1) DBI (Tim Bunce specifically asked for help in re-designing the test
suite).
2) CPANPLUS.
3) Module::Build.
I'm all for having those biggies handled by Phalanx, and handled well.
That's why I'd like to hold off on the top two tiers at
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/distros.html until we get
While Andy would certainly be the best person to answer this, I rather
like the idea of an entire
Perl Mongers group becoming a hoplite. I can't help but wonder if a
little friendly competition
amongst groups might be a wonderful thing. Who can get the most
modules tested?
I agree entirely.
So does anyone have anything to report as far as progress on their
modules? Reports back to update on the website would be appreciated.
Note that all the status pages, like
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/status/Archive-Tar.html are actually POD
behind the scenes, so if Andrew wanted to update
Ottawa eh? Well, if the infamous `/anick is involved, I'm
sure we are all
in for a lot of fun. ;-)
I don't know if he will be. His name usually comes up once every other
meeting or so, but nobody who goes to the meetings has actually seen him in
real life! Sort of like the Yeti, except
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:16:57AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm still a little concerned about hitting problems with Storable, so I
think I'll apply the patch and then run cpancover on a bunch of modules
and compare the output to that of Data::Dumper/eval. If all goes well
I'll keep the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:38:31PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
1) DBI (Tim Bunce specifically asked for help in re-designing the test
suite).
2) CPANPLUS.
3) Module::Build.
I'm all for having those biggies handled by Phalanx, and handled well.
That's why I'd like to hold off on the
At 06:40 PM 10/29/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Adam Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other problematic test is ye =
olde -0 error,
t/op/number_10.t seems to be failing because of -0 from Cmod.
Any hints what to do WRT such behavior?
leo
Its an issue with our (IBM's) compiler. It
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Types:
iv=long long, intvalsize=8, intsize=4, opcode_t=long long,
opcode_t_size=8,
ptrsize=4, ptr_alignment=4 byteorder=12345678,
nv=double, numvalsize=8, doublesize=8
Can you
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 06:40 PM 10/29/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Adam Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other problematic test is ye =
olde -0 error,
Its an issue with our (IBM's) compiler. It comes from
0.0-0.0*0.0 as a result of the mod test if I
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
Object Instantiation
Dan had a moment of clarity and declared that the Parrot Way to
instantiate an object in class Foo will be:
new P5, .Foo
All we need now is a working implementation. And, apparently, knowing
what
I don't know why, exactly, but extend test 11 and 12 don't work on
windiws, at least under cygwin--they hang. (For a while extend 11 was
sucking down all availabe memory, which was fun)
Is anyone else seeing this? (Heck, is anyone else trying with cygwin on
windows?) I'm tempted to disable the
I don't know why, exactly, but extend test 11 and 12 don't work on
windiws, at least under cygwin--they hang. (For a while extend 11 was
sucking down all availabe memory, which was fun)
Is anyone else seeing this? (Heck, is anyone else trying with cygwin on
windows?) I'm tempted to disable
Here is entire output of make test on cygwin, FYI.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/parrot/parrot
$ make test
perl t/harness t/src/*.t
t/src/basic...ok
t/src/exitNOK 3
# got: 'ex3
# '
# expected: 'ex3
# ex2
# ex1
# '
# Looks like you failed 1 tests of 3.
t/src/exitdubious
- Original Message -
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: Tinderboxens
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know why, exactly, but extend test 11 and 12 don't work on
windiws, at least under cygwin--they hang.
Could be the missing prototypes for Parrot_call (the prototype is in
extend.h, but over things are missing, so I used the emedding interface,
where
At 07:25 PM 10/28/2003 +, via RT wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #24341]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24341
The new classes/null.pl was trying to
This will have to wait until after the release, of course, but the ponie
stuff has brought up a *really* good point that needs addressing. There's
no good way to get or set a generic pointer in a PMC. Right now we're
either cheating (by poking into the guts of a PMC) or hijacking an exiting
entry
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't tend to test it much on cygwin, but have done it now. Of possible
interest is this warning when running Configure.pl:-
Determining some sizes...
Hmm, I see your chosen INTVAL isn't the same size as your pointers.
This doesn't really look
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t\src\extend.t1 256121 8.33% 11
'fraid it wasn't. Still fails in the same way. Sorry.
Checked in another change, Win32 seems to buffer stderr too, added
a fflush(stderr).
Jonathan
leo
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t\src\extend.t1 256121 8.33% 11
'fraid it wasn't. Still fails in the same way. Sorry.
Checked in another change, Win32 seems to buffer stderr too, added
a fflush(stderr).
With
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(void *)get_pointer()
void set_pointer(void *)
Good. So we can clean up cheating in Sub PMCs, where we are using
_integer vtables, when actually absolute byte-code addressess are
passed.
Dan
leo
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(void *)get_pointer()
void set_pointer(void *)
Good. So we can clean up cheating in Sub PMCs, where we are using
_integer vtables, when actually absolute byte-code addressess are
passed.
Yep, I was
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #24355]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24355
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
before we release Parrot
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't tend to test it much on cygwin, but have done it now. Of possible
interest is this warning when running Configure.pl:-
Determining some sizes...
Hmm, I see your chosen INTVAL isn't the same size as your pointers.
This doesn't really
At 02:51 PM 10/29/2003 +, via RT wrote:
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #24355]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24355
before we release Parrot to the wild
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Types:
iv=long long, intvalsize=8, intsize=4, opcode_t=long long,
opcode_t_size=8,
ptrsize=4, ptr_alignment=4 byteorder=12345678,
nv=double, numvalsize=8, doublesize=8
Can you Configure it with intval=int?
Yeah, that gets rid of
Adam Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other problematic test is ye =
olde -0 error,
t/op/number_10.t seems to be failing because of -0 from Cmod.
Any hints what to do WRT such behavior?
leo
I just reread the section of A6 about currying, and I have several
questions about it.
1) Suppose I have a function like the following:
sub foo($param, @param) {...}
where the parameter names differ only by their sigils. Is it legal
for me to type
Joe Gottman writes:
I just reread the section of A6 about currying, and I have several
questions about it.
1) Suppose I have a function like the following:
sub foo($param, @param) {...}
where the parameter names differ only by their sigils. Is it legal
for me
Some of patches on that list that are mine.
#24030 Obsolete
#24038 Obsolete
#24043 Applied
#24063 Applied
#24177 Rejected
#24188 Applied
I tried to update the status of #24177 but got Permission Denied.
Any chance of that being changed so I could update them myself?
You have to log in
Parrot fetched its first web page tonight. Its a baby step, but hey... :)
You can now stuff hostnames into a socket as well as a numeric IP address.
see examples/io/http.imc
-Melvin
48 matches
Mail list logo
