On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:57:52PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
Hodges, Paul writes:
I'd *like* to be able to predeclare a trait or property to be distributed
across any values placed in this array, but only this array. For example, it
would be nice if I could have the default aspects of false
Hi!
Finally, here's my first release of Module::CPANTS::Generator, a framework
to test all distributions on CPAN for 'kwalitee'.
It should be easier to use and run, it should be easer to add new metrics
and different ways to report results. On the downside, it currently includes
less metrics
If nobody objects to this I will apply this patch in 3 days (I think
this is a reasonable time)
Ok, time is up,
committed
boe
--
Juergen Boemmels[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fachbereich Physik Tel: ++49-(0)631-205-2817
Universitaet Kaiserslautern
I've checked in a bunch of object stuff mainly attributes and a first
try to call a method.
Some remarks:
newclass P1, Foo
addattrib I1, P1, i
set I2, P1[Foo\x00i] # I1 == I2
gets currently the attribute idx (0) of $Foo::i.
Q: Should the assembler mangle the Foo::i to Foo\0i
Same
At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
set I2, P1[Foo\x00i] # I1 == I2
gets currently the attribute idx (0) of $Foo::i.
Q: Should the assembler mangle the Foo::i to Foo\0i
Something about this embedded \0 character
bugs me. I know its what Dan has in the design doc but
it just
Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:14 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
set I2, P1[Foo\x00i] # I1 == I2
gets currently the attribute idx (0) of $Foo::i.
Q: Should the assembler mangle the Foo::i to Foo\0i
Something about this embedded \0 character
bugs me. I know its
Jonathan Scott Duff writes:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:57:52PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
Hodges, Paul writes:
I'd *like* to be able to predeclare a trait or property to be distributed
across any values placed in this array, but only this array. For example, it
would be nice if I could
