Vladimir Lipsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some time ago I mentioned I'd been gettin' one more segfault while the
Parrot debug mode was on. In fact, it proved to be an effect of the
same cause -- we have global resources sharable among interpreters,
that we try to free more than once. This time
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you recheck that after my fix to vtable freeing? My patch covered
encoding and chartype too.
No, I didn't. Did you fix the Parrot_loadbc function name? If didn't, I'll
have a go for Parrot_set_PackFile()
leo
0x4C56
Happy
.~.
At 9:04 PM +0100 12/2/03, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Hey,
I'm right now looking at getting a proper implementation of array/string
offsets done for the PHP compiler.
Here's the problem, in PHP you can access indices of both string's an
array's in the same way, meaning:
[Snip PHP treating strings as
At 3:29 PM +0100 12/7/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got mugged by the flu, [ ... ]
[ ... ] Objects'll be the death of me, I swear...
I don't hope, that this is anyhow related to my checkins,
Nah--objects just hate me. :)
--
At 1:21 PM -0500 12/3/03, Melvin Smith wrote:
We should have 1 recommended way for testing NULL registers.
If we support get_bool() then lets make sure it works for REAL NULL
pmc registers as well as PMCNULL.
If not, code will appear to work correctly on a safe core
but will seg fault on some
At 9:18 AM -0700 12/3/03, Cory Spencer wrote:
We're already using 'eq' to perform equality testing, and in the interests
of maintaining a consistent design I would choose to stick with something
eq-related as opposed to changing it to 'same'.
eqaddr/eqval? eq_addr/eq_val?
At 12:15 PM +0100 12/7/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Pete Lomax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... only to find there are no such equivalents for ne, gt, and ge.
I've added these missing ops now. *But* there are a lot more missing:
Yeah, we need all the comparison operators for PMCs in both numeric
and
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:35:59 -0500, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:15 PM +0100 12/7/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Pete Lomax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... only to find there are no such equivalents for ne, gt, and ge.
I've added these missing ops now. *But* there are a lot more
Pete Lomax writes:
I'm not convinced at all here. PMC comparison ops, afaict, are based
solely on the pmc instance/address
Here's a snippet to play with:
$P1 = new Array
$P1 = 2
$P1[0] = 1
$P1[1] = 1
$P2 = new Array
$P2 = 2
$P2[0] = 1
On Monday, December 8, 2003, at 10:03 , Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 1:21 PM -0500 12/3/03, Melvin Smith wrote:
We should have 1 recommended way for testing NULL registers.
If we support get_bool() then lets make sure it works for REAL NULL
pmc registers as well as PMCNULL.
If not, code will appear
10 matches
Mail list logo