Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Leo wrote:
I've added two test files, bitwise.t and concat.t, which go in t/op/
(the op/ directory doesn't exist yet)
Missing?
The directory needs to be added. We're gradually moving our way toward
the test hierarchy planned on p6d:
p6d?
apologies for the recent spam leakage.. it looks like I need to do my
bi-monthly tuning.
I'll try and get to it as soon as I can.
-R
Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo wrote:
I've added two test files, bitwise.t and concat.t, which go in t/op/
(the op/ directory doesn't exist yet)
Missing?
The directory needs to be added. We're gradually moving our way toward
the test hierarchy planned on p6d:
t/var
t/op
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue turns out to be that SIGFPE isn't raised on Mac OS X on
divide by zero. If I hack src/core_ops.c to explicitly raise(SIGFPE) in
the case of zero divisor then the tests pass, so the exception handling
code seems to be working correctly.
Ah, good
JüRgen BöMmels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the *.ops files are lying in the ops/ directory, but the generated
c-files go to the src/ directory. This is completly different from
classes/, imcc/ etc. where the generated c-files go to the same
directory. Is this difference intentional?
Sounds
# New Ticket Created by Seymour Medeiros
# Please include the string: [perl #24715]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24715
Refinance today to as low as 1.5%! or buy
the home of your dreams!
It's not
On Dec 20, 2003, at 1:54 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue turns out to be that SIGFPE isn't raised on Mac OS X on
divide by zero. If I hack src/core_ops.c to explicitly raise(SIGFPE)
in
the case of zero divisor then the tests pass, so the exception
Piers wrote:
p6d?
The perl6-documentation list. Started around Nov. 2002, it had about 3
months of heavy traffic and not much since. But, we did get a good plan
for the direction of p6 testing out of it.
Allison
Leo wrote:
I had a short look at the subdir hierarchy, looks good.
Excellent.
(perl6:run_tests, Makefile, and t/harness have to learn how to deal with
differently deep nested test files though).
Yeah, that's on my Todo list. Hmmm... I should probably add the list to
the repository.
If
Larry Wall wrote:
Maybe there's an intermediate syntactic form like:
$x but subclass MyClass does FooBar[bar] { }
IMHO, Cbut should be defined as generating a singleton class that
derives from the variable's class and composes a specified role - but not
neccessarily a Ipre-existing role.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 12:41:10PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: So what happens if more than one of the candidates is tagged as the
: default? The same thing as if none of them was? This could happen if
: both Predator and Pet have declared their 'feed' methods as the default.
Could blow up,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) writes:
is classof($x)
Ouch. $x's class isn't a property or trait of it?
class AnonClass is classof($x) does FooBar { }.bless($x, foobar = bar)
I don't understand what the bit at the end is doing. This is calling .bless
on the overriden method? And I'm not
Main changes
added is_fastest()
comparison was broken (but not completely broken so it still passed the tests)
available soon on CPAN and now on
http://www.fergaldaly.com/computer/Test-Benchmark/
F
Is it possible to unread characters from an input stream in Parrot? (ie.
if I do a read char, 1, decide later than I don't want the character so
I push it back on the stream)
Failing that, is it possible to peek ahead at a character without
necessarily taking it off the stream?
Larry Wall wrote:
Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Arguably, the role's might be required to declare their methods
: multi if they want to participate in this, but that's one of those
: things that feel like they ought to be declared by the user rather
: than the definer. On the other hand, maybe
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:12:53PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Naming in what way? As a descriptive term for discussing them in general,
: or naming individual collections for reference purposes in the code?
I meant naming primarily as in how you select a particular group of them.
They don't
Larry Wall wrote:
Jonathan Lang wrote:
: It also occurs to me that traits can be thought of
: as adjectives (thus the is trait vs. is a class distinction) -
: another way to attach an adjective to a noun in English is to prepend
: it to the noun:
:
: my Dog $Spot is red;
: my black
Larry Wall wrote:
Jonathan Lang wrote:
: In a similar vein, what about making a disjunction of classes in an
: Cis or Cisa clause synonymous with a sequence of appropriate
: clauses? Ditto with traits and Cis, roles and Cdoes, attributes
: and Chas, etc.; thus:
:
: class DangerousPet
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:21:10PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:12:53PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: : Why not do it the same way that namespace scoping collisions are resolved:
: : the local scope trumps the caller's scope. Rinse, lather, repeat.
Actually, I didn't
# New Ticket Created by Madge Anaya
# Please include the string: [perl #24722]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24722
shingle craftsmen actual see cutworm pavanne bernhard rumble mottle ambitious
yolk
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: [perl] Re: Object Order of Precedence (Was: Vocabulary)
Larry Wall wrote:
If DangerousPet doesn't define a feed method at all, then we might
dispatch
Joe Gottman writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: [perl] Re: Object Order of Precedence (Was: Vocabulary)
Larry Wall wrote:
If DangerousPet doesn't define a feed method at
Luke Palmer wrote:
Joe Gottman writes:
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: [perl] Re: Object Order of Precedence (Was: Vocabulary)
Larry Wall wrote:
If DangerousPet doesn't define a feed
23 matches
Mail list logo
