Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the spirit of getting real continuations working Just Right, this
modifies IMCC's PCC implementation to emit the updatecc *after* the
pushtop, so that the redundant pushtop isn't necessary when returning
with a real continuation.
The PCC shortcuts in
$Config{archname} wasn't getting parsed quite right on OS X and so JIT
wasn't getting detected in some cases. I checked in a fix for that.
It's certainly nice to see the tests run faster.
make test
All tests successful, 49 subtests skipped.
Files=90, Tests=1289, 138 wallclock secs (47.38 cusr +
Michael Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, on looking closer at that, could someone demuddle my ignorance and
tell me why the t/src tests are not run under testj?
These don't have a run-loop, so you can't run these with any run-core.
A plain make test covers src tests, running src tests again
David Storrs wrote:
Given this code:
if ( some_expensive_lookup_function() = $MAX_RECORDS ) {
mark_that_we_have_reached_max_records();
return;
}
After I enter that block once, I never want to evaluate the condition
again--I want the code to completely disappear
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:37:21 -0800
David Storrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given this code:
if ( some_expensive_lookup_function() = $MAX_RECORDS ) {
mark_that_we_have_reached_max_records();
return;
}
After I enter that block once, I never want to
Jonathan Scott Duff writes:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:16:48PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
So, let's say you have something like:
$x = 100_000;
my $seen;
while $x -- 0 {
Don't do that! I had to look at this twice before I decided that
perl6 didn't get a new operator :)
Leopold Toetsch writes:
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the spirit of getting real continuations working Just Right, this
modifies IMCC's PCC implementation to emit the updatecc *after* the
pushtop, so that the redundant pushtop isn't necessary when returning
with a real
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch writes:
The PCC shortcuts in imcc only deal with normal Sub calls (Sub and
Closure, Coroutines should be ok too). Full Continuations currenty need
some hints by the programmer.
Do you have an example what do you want to achieve?
Yep.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:01:41PM +, Harry Jackson wrote:
If there are any shy lurkers out there please speak now or forever hold
your peace.
Well, here i speak ;-)
I have some (minor) skills in C, Perl, Networking, compiling, and other
stuff. I also downloaded Parrot some months ago,
At 10:16 PM 1/13/2004 -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
David Storrs writes:
Given this code:
if ( some_expensive_lookup_function() = $MAX_RECORDS ) {
mark_that_we_have_reached_max_records();
return;
}
After I enter that block once, I never want to evaluate the condition
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:16:48PM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
sub mark_that_we_have_reached_max_records() {
$max_reached = 1;
}
if !$max_reached some_expensive_lookup_function() $MAX_RECORDS {
mark_that_we_have_reached_max_records();
return;
}
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:59:52AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
I think Perl6 will allow a hint like so:
my int $max_reached;
The important thing is that $max_reached is used simply as a conditional,
and you don't pass it to a routine or otherwise use it in a way to cause it
to be
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:57:05AM +, Richard Nuttall wrote:
How about
$test = sub
{
if ( some_expensive_lookup_function() = $MAX_RECORDS )
mark_that_we_have_reached_max_records();
$test = sub{};
};
Then call $test() as needed;
Neat. I wouldn't
At 09:31 AM 1/14/2004 -0800, David Storrs wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:59:52AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote:
I think Perl6 will allow a hint like so:
my int $max_reached;
The important thing is that $max_reached is used simply as a conditional,
and you don't pass it to a routine or
David Storrs writes:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:57:05AM +, Richard Nuttall wrote:
How about
$test = sub
{
if ( some_expensive_lookup_function() = $MAX_RECORDS )
mark_that_we_have_reached_max_records();
$test = sub{};
};
Then call $test()
At 12:36 PM -0500 1/13/04, Uri Guttman wrote:
TP6S == The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TP6S Congratulations Dan
TP6S Melvin Smith offered his congratulations to Dan for the
TP6S first commercial use of Parrot. I think I can safely say we
TP6S all echo those
* Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-14 19:03]:
Let's not mention that that has way more overhead than a
short-circuiting test, but I guess the idea's the important
thing.
How about a calculated goto? *grin*
--
Regards,
Aristotle
If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life
On Jan 12, 2004, at 10:03 AM, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 04:29 , Jeff Clites wrote:
5) Java seems to use a check-in/check-out model for access to global
data, in which global data lives in a central store, but is copied
back-and-forth to thread-local storage for
18 matches
Mail list logo
