--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: Stig Brautaset [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: perl6-internals@perl.org
Betreff: patch to unbreak 'make clean'
Datum: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:19:12 +0100
Hi,
This patch fixes 'make clean' for me.
Thanks for pointing this out. Patch applied in r9623. Obviously I
In his use.perl.org journal, Luke wrote:
To be fair, Damian responded to my query, but he didn't answer my
question. He gave more an example of how submethods are used, rather
than why they are used.
Subroutines are useful inside classes, for factoring class-specific
implementation details
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #37561]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37561
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.4.21-27.0.2.elsmp
arch=
Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's a simpler snippet that displays the same failure:
.sub _main :main
.local pmc pir
pir = compreg PIR
new_pad 0
$S0 = END_PIR
.sub a
$P1 = find_lex 1, '$a'
.end
END_PIR
$P2 = pir($S0) # using find_name to get the the PMC for a
On Oct 29, 2005, at 16:48, Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
However, there appears to be a register conflict somewhere,
because in the line $P0 = pop args both $P0 and args end
up using the same register, thus xyz ends up displaying
A register alligator bug. I've turned off the code
On 10/28/05, Christopher D. Malon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 28, 2005, at 11:13 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
Trying to think through the VectorSpace example, and a slightly
more complicated example (a Field), I'm starting to wonder whether
roles need to be parameterized somehow. (Maybe they
On 10/29/05, Damian Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we need a mechanism that is externally (i.e. from a class interface
point-of-view) a subroutine, but internally has the features of a method (i.e.
has an invocant). Since it's externally sub-like but internally method-like,
we call this
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 04:28:20AM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
On Thursday 27 October 2005 09:37 pm, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:22:40PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
On Oct 27, 2005, at 22:31, Nick Glencross wrote:
There are a few cases of -1 being assigned to
Luke,
On Oct 29, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
Another thing that scares me with the utility sub point of view
follows:
class Foo {
method process_data($data) {
$.help_process_data($data);
}
submethod help_process_data($data) {
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 14:04:35 -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
That there will not be two slots for $:foo in Xy, but only one.
But, I'm probably wrong about this as the X role may have methods that
use $:foo in one way and the Y role may have methods that use $:foo in
some other,
Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's a simpler snippet that displays the same failure:
.sub _main :main
.local pmc pir
pir = compreg PIR
new_pad 0
$S0 = END_PIR
.sub a
$P1 = find_lex 1, '$a'
.end
END_PIR
$P2 =
On Oct 30, 2005, at 1:17, Matt Diephouse wrote:
$P2 = pir($S0)
$P2 = $P2[0] # get to the first Sub in the Eval
store_global b, $P2
The indexed access is still a bit experimental. But anyway - why would
you store_global the sub, when just naming it b does that already?
leo
Quick question...
I've been looking through inter_run and extend to see how to pass
arguments to a parrot method/function from C, but all the prototypes
that I've seen have '...' or 'va_list' to accept the arguments.
If I don't know what the arguments or their respective types are at
13 matches
Mail list logo
