On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 19:18 +0200, Juerd wrote:
Now:
Declaration ExplicitImplicit $_ $?SELF
has $.var | $obj.var \ .var \ ./var \
has $:var | $obj.:var \ .:var \ ./:var \
Consistent:
has $.var \ $obj.var \
Aaron Sherman skribis 2005-05-16 5:54 (-0400):
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 19:18 +0200, Juerd wrote:
Now:
Declaration ExplicitImplicit $_ $?SELF
has $.var | $obj.var \ .var \ ./var \
has $:var | $obj.:var \ .:var \ ./:var \
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 12:23 +0200, Juerd wrote:
Aaron Sherman skribis 2005-05-16 5:54 (-0400):
I'm not sure I see that you changed anything
[...]
Okay, let's try it differently, then:
[...something that looks like braille...]
And now, you've s/[\$\w]+//g; what point are you making, Juerd?
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 09:08, Aaron Sherman wrote:
Well, there's the problem. If you see those as the same symbol, then of
course this is deeply confusing.
I just want to make the point that the you in that sentence is you,
the user of Perl, not you, Juerd. Obviously, you are not confused
here,
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 18:34 +0200, Juerd wrote:
I've been looking for a good moment to come with this, but there is
none, making this as good a point as any: I don't like the dot in
attributes, and the colon that replaces it.
If we have .method and .:method, then we should have $.attr and
Now:
Declaration ExplicitImplicit $_ $?SELF
has $.var | $obj.var \ .var \ ./var \
has $:var | $obj.:var \ .:var \ ./:var \
Consistent:
has $.var \ $obj.var \ .var \ ./var \
has $.:var \
