On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
My brain was in PMC == class mode when I wrote what I wrote above, but
now I need to rethink, since that's not a given (yet?).
Not a given ever. PMCs may have a backing namespace, and that namespace
may be a HLL class, but it might not.
The terminology
I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
single-inheritance objects up and running.
At the moment, I'm torn between just having a new method of some sort in
the class and having a vtable method on the class PMC that returns an
object of that class. (get_pmc on the
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
single-inheritance objects up and running.
At the moment, I'm torn between just having a new method of some sort in
the class and having a vtable method on the class PMC that returns an
On Oct 15, 2003, at 8:36 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
single-inheritance objects up and running.
At the moment, I'm torn between just having a new method of some sort
in
the class and having a vtable method on the class PMC that
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
On Oct 15, 2003, at 8:36 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
single-inheritance objects up and running.
At the moment, I'm torn between just having a new method of some sort
in
the class
At 03:49 PM 10/15/2003 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
On Oct 15, 2003, at 8:36 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at least
single-inheritance objects up and running.
At the moment, I'm torn between just
On Oct 15, 2003, at 1:48 PM, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 03:49 PM 10/15/2003 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
On Oct 15, 2003, at 8:36 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
I'm poking around in the object stuff today, to try and get at
least
single-inheritance objects up
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Clites wrote:
What do you mean by new method in the class above?
In this case, the new method is a named method in the class namespace
that we look up and call. We'd look it up and dispatch to it.
A more low level like POV
Leopold Toetsch writes:
I think that for supporting Ruby or such we have to keep fences between
PMCs and real objects very low.
Agreed, or have some sort of automagic transformation possible.
So it should be possible to define an Imaginary Number class that
inherits from two (Perl?)Nums
