Re: Looking for a Parrot contact person

2002-10-27 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Gopal V wrote: If memory serves me right, Leopold Toetsch wrote: `PackFile_unpack: Bytecode not valid for this interpreter: version mismatch' Ah, this one. s. [perl #18072] [PATCH] fingerprinting the PBC and an early thread with the keyowrd fingerprinting. Also mentioned in the thread

Re: Looking for a Parrot contact person

2002-10-26 Thread Gopal V
If memory serves me right, Leopold Toetsch wrote: The changes are 99.9% internal - all (parrot + perl6) tests are running during these changes. Hmm... a .pbc I assembled last week refused to run today ... which was really surprising for me .. `PackFile_unpack: Bytecode not valid for this

Looking for a Parrot contact person

2002-10-26 Thread Gopal V
Hi All, We've been thinking long and hard about Parrot and found that the spec viz packfile versions , code segmentations, opcodes and virtually everything is changing minute to minute ... So we think it might do good to have a Parrot-dev'r do the co-ordination duties . What I

Re: Looking for a Parrot contact person

2002-10-26 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Gopal V wrote: Hi All, We've been thinking long and hard about Parrot and found that the spec viz packfile versions , code segmentations, opcodes and virtually everything is changing minute to minute ... No specs are changing currently, but there is some discussion, how to continue, how to