[perl #46667] [TODO] [C] Do we need properties in the default object system?

2008-09-30 Thread NotFound via RT
This check can be removed from default.pmc. Property values should not be returned by get_attr_str. Done in r31509

[perl #46667] [TODO] [C] Do we need properties in the default object system?

2008-01-12 Thread Allison Randal via RT
On Mon Oct 22 09:34:51 2007, ptc wrote: In src/pmc/default.pmc:get_attr_str() there is the todo item: /* let's look for props first * XXX do we need that in the default object system? We require an answer to this question, and quite possibly further development depending upon the answer

[perl #46667] [TODO] [C] Do we need properties in the default object system?

2007-10-22 Thread via RT
for props first * XXX do we need that in the default object system? We require an answer to this question, and quite possibly further development depending upon the answer.

Re: Object system

2004-01-02 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I notice that ParrotObject only has [get|set]_integer_keyed. I assume we intend to make those for the rest of the data types. Yep. Albeit before continuing here filling the blanks, I'd really like to have attribute naming/mangling clarified. The pmc

Object system

2003-12-31 Thread Luke Palmer
Since I'm working on a compiler that requires objects, and seeing as how we have a python compiler now hanging over our heads, what work is necessary to finish up the object system? I notice that ParrotObject only has [get|set]_integer_keyed. I assume we intend to make those for the rest