Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:01 PM 2/28/2004 -0800, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
I made the change, and now I get consistent results. I'll check that in.
I am still not clear, though, on why we wouldn't have the same failure
in all cases. I'd think these should be equivalent:
*
I'm currently preparing 0.1.0, so please no changes to CVS until further
ntice.
Thanks,
leo
On 29 Feb 2004, at 03:07, Robert Spier wrote:
[...]
Someone else can take care of this for him. (And I know he'd love it
if someone stepped forward to become official web content maintainer.)
We'll provide that person with resources and support, and it'll be
quite fun and easy for everyone.
Hi,
the following test gives wrong results on i386/JIT.
It looks like the set_i_n JIT op rounds the number, whereas
the non JIT OP does not round the number.
jens
output_is('CODE', 'OUT', set_i_n testing);
##PIR##
.sub _main
.local num n
.local int i
n = 1.4
i = n
print i
Hi leo,
Am Sonntag, 29. Februar 2004 11:47 schrieb Leopold Toetsch:
I'm currently preparing 0.1.0, so please no changes to CVS until further
ntice.
Here is the tetris example, include it if you want...
Thanks,
leo
jens
tetris.tgz
Description: application/tgz
Jens Rieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi leo,
Am Sonntag, 29. Februar 2004 11:47 schrieb Leopold Toetsch:
I'm currently preparing 0.1.0, so please no changes to CVS until further
ntice.
Here is the tetris example, include it if you want...
Sorry, too late. Next time.
jens
leo
Currently working on 10a of RELEASE_INSTRUCTIONS everything should be
done, so let the checkins begin.
Have fun,
leo
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Currently working on 10a of RELEASE_INSTRUCTIONS everything should be
done, so let the checkins begin.
Woohoo!
Well done.
I see it's all over use.perl now too.
Nicholas Clark
Is there a way to unstore a lexical in a scope?
--
Will Coke Coledawill at coleda
dot com
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 06:43, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Kenneth A Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 16:08, Kenneth A Graves wrote:
How do I verify which runloops/features are working?
CGoto core: make testg testC
Both give:
All tests successful, 1 test and 61 subtests
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 03:43, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
CGoto core: make testg testC
Both of these worked on Linux PPC with gcc-3.2.3
I did see an intermittent hang, this time on the second test of
t/src/intlist.t. killall -HUP intlist_2 made the test continue, though
it failed.
JIT:
On Friday, February 27, 2004, at 12:26 , Andrew Dougherty wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
inet_pton is preferrable, as it supports IPv6.
That is, inet_pton should trump inet_aton if both are available.
Probably, but that would require testing to see if inet_pton is
* Leopold Toetsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040228 23:59]:
Paul Cochrane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got parrot to build on Alpha OSF1, but I can't get make test to go. Here's
what I see:
rolf:[524]/var/tmp/parrot/usr/bin/make test
perl t/harness --gc-debug --running-make-test -b
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #27243]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27243
Changes 2 lines (marked ** below) in t\harness to correct errors in the POD
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #27246]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27246
There was no
PERL = ${perl}
definition in this file (which does
Parrot 0.1.0 Leaping Kakapo Released!
The Parrot team proudly presents the Parrot 0.1.0 leap release. It
provides some milestones like objects and multi-threading1[1] and
supports many more platforms.
After some pause you can grab it from
17 matches
Mail list logo
