Dan wrote:
At 09:12 AM 8/25/00 -0400, Stephen P. Potter wrote:
As you say, 200 lines isn't much. But combine that with the IPC, the
environment, the system, etc it all adds up.
Not to much, though. We've been down this road for perl 5. You'd be
surprised at how little code gets removed if
(voice over)
When we last left our heroes,
Dan Sugalski-Walker , Master Larry Wall
Damian-3P0, and FurB-D2
were on their way to find a fast ship.
With the plans for perl 6 in the memory banks of FurB-D2,
they were going to the Monterey System to announce the
start of Perl 6 and to marshal
Buddha Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
=At 11:26 AM 8/23/00 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
=
=I expect that we'll get more compile-time benefit from
=
= my HASH sub foo {
= ...
= }
=
= %bar = foo();
=
=So how would you fill in the type in:
=
=my TYPE sub foo {
= ...
= if
