Re: Parrot 0.1.0 -- what's left?

2003-08-19 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Benjamin Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Allow .macro in imcc, for when we're parsing pir code. This is already enabled. Macro-ize the stub functions in default.pmc, so that throwing an exception takes one line of C code. Yep. And autogenerate these from vtable.tbl if default.pmc has no

Re: Parrot 0.1.0 -- what's left?

2003-08-18 Thread Benjamin Goldberg
Steve Fink wrote: In light of the insane amount of work that's gone into Parrot recently, I'd say it's about time to cut another release. What else would people like to slip in? This is not a freeze announcement yet -- I want to know what people think of the state of things they're working

Re: Parrot 0.1.0 -- what's left?

2003-08-14 Thread Luke Palmer
Steve Fink writes: In light of the insane amount of work that's gone into Parrot recently, I'd say it's about time to cut another release. What else would people like to slip in? This is not a freeze announcement yet -- I want to know what people think of the state of things they're working

Re: Parrot 0.1.0 -- what's left?

2003-08-14 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Steve Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to know what people think of the state of things they're working on first. PCC is still missing the return convention stuff (and unifying call and return convention) PackFile is in flux, but this need a lot more anyway. As for the version number --