Aaron Sherman writes:
: On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:30:00AM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
:
: Glenn wrote:
:
: Have I missed anything?
:
: Perhaps you've missed one thing.
:
: [snip]
:
: Perl 6 could provide a pragma to produce a warning on the first
:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
So then the lexically scoped operator:+ wouldn't be able to achieve
the goal of my suggested implicit numerification warning... the goal
being the ability to ensure that there are no implicit numerifications,
that all
Aaron Sherman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
So then the lexically scoped operator:+ wouldn't be able to achieve
the goal of my suggested implicit numerification warning... the goal
being the ability to ensure that there are no implicit
Piers Cawley has written a nice article entitled: Perl 6 : Not Just For
Damians.
If the hair on the back of your neck rises when thinking about Perl 6, or
even if it doesn't... give it a read.
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/10/23/damians.html
GG == Garrett Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GG Piers Cawley has written a nice article entitled: Perl 6 : Not
GG Just For Damians.
GG If the hair on the back of your neck rises when thinking about
GG Perl 6, or even if it doesn't... give it a read.
GG
