Re: S5 updated

2004-09-22 Thread Edward Peschko
ok, cool, I'm beginning to understand perl6 patterns a bit better. Just a tiny request though (and I seem to remember this being discussed) You were the one who initiated the thread :-) Ah yes, I forgot about that. Damn brain cells.. ;-) - I wish that there was an easy syntax to

Re: S5 updated

2004-09-22 Thread Edward Peschko
The reason for the modifier (or even a new operator (g/ for example) is that you can easily test your regular expressions. The interface is trivial - all you have to do is switch your m/ out for g/, and sit back and see how your patterns translate into strings. Yeah, that looks

Re: S5 updated

2004-09-22 Thread chromatic
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 10:49, Luke Palmer wrote: Let me come right round to my point about perl being open source. Someone has to do the work somewhere, and making it standard or core doesn't change that. It just means that it'll take longer. It also means that there's a possibility that the

This week's summary

2004-09-22 Thread The Perl 6 Summarizer
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2004-09-17 Another week, another summary, and I'm running late. So: This week in perl6-compiler The current state of the compiler Discussion of the current state of the nascent perl 6 compiler and how best to contribute to its development even

Re: S5 updated

2004-09-22 Thread Luke Palmer
First off, I'll point out that this belongs on p6l and nowhere else. Edward Peschko writes: It all comes down to what you think is a 'low level' op.. Some languages think that regular expressions themselves aren't low level enough to be included in the language, perl thinks that it is