Considering that proper and common usage, not to mention strictures,
dictates a heavy insistence on 'my'. I will thus assume that creation of
lexical variables with 'my' far out numbers the creation of package
space globals. Should we not then have it where it's the default
behavior, and
Rod Adams writes:
Considering that proper and common usage, not to mention strictures,
dictates a heavy insistence on 'my'. I will thus assume that creation
of lexical variables with 'my' far out numbers the creation of package
space globals. Should we not then have it where it's the default
Rod Adams skribis 2004-12-18 14:55 (-0600):
Considering that proper and common usage, not to mention strictures,
dictates a heavy insistence on 'my'. I will thus assume that creation of
lexical variables with 'my' far out numbers the creation of package
space globals. Should we not then
- Original Message -
From: Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, December 18, 2004 4:16 pm
Subject: Re: Auto My?
Rod Adams writes:
There are pros and cons, and it basically ends up being a design
choice.
Well, at least when strictures are on. When they are off, the
coder
JOSEPH RYAN writes:
As bad of an idea that I think this is, I wonder if Perl6's reflection
capabilities will be powerful enough to where a module/pragma could be
written that would be able to do this? For instance, one idea was:
lexically change the current grammar to a subclass of the
