Rod Adams wrote:
It used to be
fooArray,Int
fooHash,Int
And has become
foo:(Array,Int)
foo:(Hash,Int)
The return type arrow -- inside the :() type spec is not
yet approved by @Larry.
In my mind, the more interesting question is what does foo without the
specifiers return when
Just a nit, for the record, with no great perl relevance:
TSa (Thomas Sandla) wrote:
But what is the first quarter of year 0? 0.25?
Sure (of course if there were a year 0 instead of becoming 1 BCE)
And the last quarter of year -1? -0.25?
Sure
That works numerically, but March of a
year is
Damian Conway wrote:
Deborah Pickett wrote:
You are going to see empty lists more often than you think in
expressions like
$product = [*] @array;
and having to write that as
$product = [*] 1, @array;
just to protect against a common case doesn't exactly flaunt Perl's
DWIMmery to me. I
It's a funny old world...
wrote Dan Sugalski on June 04, 2005 in his Squawks of the Parrot blog.
Go and see: http://www.sidhe.org/~dan/blog/archives/000400.html.
Hence the subject.
What the heck is wrong with Parrot development?
anonymous coward
Larry,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:31:01PM +0200, anonymous coward wrote:
: It's a funny old world...
: wrote Dan Sugalski on June 04, 2005 in his Squawks of the Parrot blog.
: Go and see: http://www.sidhe.org/~dan/blog/archives/000400.html.
:
: Hence the subject.
:
: What the heck is wrong
Fagyal Csongor wrote:
With all respect, I think this is a very important thing which needs
attention, and I hope that you will help us to clarify the situation. I
am pretty sure Dan did not leave because he had a bad day - we know he
Dan's position was very stressful, he had people from all
SV == Sam Vilain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SV Please honour his decision to bow out gracefully without turning it into
SV a childish battle of egos.
SV In the meantime let us celebrate 5 years of Dan Sugalski's contribution
SV to the Parrot and Perl 6 project.
SV Three cheers for
Damian Conway wrote:
What you want is:
$product = ([*] @values err 0);
Or:
$factorial = ([*] 1..$n err 1);
The err operator bind only to the point on the instruction it is
attached to, ie it's not a shortcut for eval(), right?
I'm just seeing some edge cases here for custom defined
