On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we find a lot of yen signs as zip-operators in the standard
library, Japanese would have a big question: Give up either
Perl6 or Windows. Which do we need? And I suppose the answer
Hmmm, begins to sound interesting... ;-P
Michele
--
voices
Hi,
S04 says thus:
The default case:
default {...}
is exactly equivalent to
when true {...}
However, that parses to:
if $_ ~~ bool::true { ...; leave }
Which is not executed if $_ is false, unless ~~ bool::true does
something special. Perhaps default should be
The current list of fears is:
You don't include my personal fear.
FEAR: I will need a lobotomy before I can make sense of Perl 6!
--
Stop the infinite loop, I want to get off! http://surreal.istic.org/
Paraphernalia/Never hides your broken bones,/ And I don't know why you'd
want to try:/
Here is my part.
On Oct 24, 2005, at 07:20 , Juerd wrote:
I've created pugs/docs/quickref/fears, a list of Perl 6 fears.
Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
[snip]
: FEAR: Perl 6 has too many operators!
FEAR: Perl 6 has so many operators that it runs out of Unicode
Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
Fear: Perl 6 will not attract enough interested developers and
companies to gain momentum. People will continue to be excited about
digital watches and PHP 5.
Regards,
Christian
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://christian.web42.com -
I'm mentally going over the ways to do it.
class Foo;
# the perl5 way
use base Base;
sub new {
my $class = shift;
my $self = $class.SUPER::new(@_); # syntax?
return $self;
}
sub do_it {
my($self, $arg) = @_;
say doing $arg!;
}
class Foo is Base {
# the perl6 way
Christian Renz wrote:
Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
Fear: Perl 6 will not attract enough interested developers and
companies to gain momentum. People will continue to be excited about
digital watches and PHP 5.
I think Perl 6 will take time to insterest developers.
On 10/24/05, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
FEAR: Perl6 internals will be just as inaccessable as p5
FEAR: The Perl6 process is driving away too many good developers
FEAR: Perl6 will not be as portable as p5
FEAR: Perl6 will not be able
On 10/24/05, Joshua Gatcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/05, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
This really isn't a fear as much as it is a complaint. It has to do with
design decisions and the list.
Perl 5 was my rewrite of Perl. I
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:47:58PM +0100, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
Another is because it will take too long to port all CPAN modules to
Perl 6 (for this I suggest a Porters force-task to interact with current
CPAN module owners and help and/or port their modules).
I think
I fear that, at age 70, I shall not live long enough to become efficient with
perl 6.
Two full years ago I purchased and read Perl 6 Essentials. That lead me to
this list which I have enjoyed but never felt competent to contribute much.
Pretty much all of what I leaned in Essentials has been
HaloO,
Luke Palmer wrote:
On 10/20/05, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing I didn't mention is that that binds both the variable
and its class. But the $ variable is of course optional after the
type, so you could just write that
sub sametype (¢T, ¢T) {...}
if you don't
Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
On 10/24/05, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
FEAR: The Perl6 process is driving away too many good developers
FEAR: Perl6 will not be as portable as p5
FEAR: Perl6 is un-necessary and the time, money, and resources
On 10/24/05, Nate Wiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
On 10/24/05, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feel free to add your own, or fears you heard about!
FEAR: The Perl6 process is driving away too many good developers
FEAR: Perl6 will not be as portable as p5
FEAR:
14 matches
Mail list logo
