On Wednesday 30 April 2008 21:58:50 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On May 1, 2008, at 0:53 , chromatic wrote:
correctness sense. Sadly, both trees and dogs bark.)
Hm, no. One's a noun, the other's a verb. Given the linguistic
orientation of [Perl 6], it seems a bit strange that the
Jon Lang dataweaver-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote:
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
And you can use CLASS in a role also, confidant that it will be looked up
according to the normal rules when the class is composed using that role,
just like any other symbol that is not found when the role is defined.
Jon Lang dataweaver-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 1, 2008, at 0:53 , chromatic wrote:
correctness sense. Sadly, both trees and dogs bark.)
Hm, no. One's a noun, the other's a verb.
chromatic chromatic-at-wgz.org |Perl 6| wrote:
This is why roles-as-types is so important: type inferencers can't infer
allomorphism because allomorphism relies on explicitly-marked semantic
meanings.
What is your nomenclature here? vary in sound without changing its
meaning?
What are
-- Original message --
From: John M. Dlugosz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon Lang dataweaver-at-gmail.com |Perl 6| wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 1, 2008, at 0:53 , chromatic wrote:
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
But there *is* some commonality there, to the extent that both are
motion. This is the kind of thing that spawned this discussion, in
fact: if what matters is motion, there is no reason *not* to substitute
one for the other.
{ draw $gun }: makes a big
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:02:27AM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
But there *is* some commonality there, to the extent that both are motion.
This is the kind of thing that spawned this discussion, in fact: if what
matters is motion, there is no reason *not* to
