On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 06:38:18PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 06:57:39PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
: Ok, it works with a $^var in place of $x in the where block.Should
: the parameter be visible there under its declared name? If not, then
: this is clearly just
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:53:06AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
I also tried this, but it caused Rakudo to throw a StopIteration and
then segfault:
for [...@gifts[0..$day-1]].pairs.reverse - $n, $g
The StopIteration occurs when there aren't enough elements in the
list to supply to the
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Patrick R. Michaud pmich...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:53:06AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
I also tried this, but it caused Rakudo to throw a StopIteration and
then segfault:
for [...@gifts[0..$day-1]].pairs.reverse - $n, $g
The
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:39:24PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Patrick R. Michaud pmich...@pobox.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:53:06AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
I also tried this, but it caused Rakudo to throw a StopIteration and
then segfault:
Yeah, I tried a couple zip-based variants, but thought the flattening
was a little confusing when combined with the reversal (so keys and
values get swapped when the list is reversed). I'd forgotten about
the ^max shorthand, though. Thanks for the reminder.
So how to loop over a list of
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Mark J. Reed markjr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Patrick R. Michaud pmich...@pobox.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:53:06AM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
I also tried this, but it caused Rakudo to throw a StopIteration and
then
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 01:38:54PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote:
Yeah, I tried a couple zip-based variants, but thought the flattening
was a little confusing when combined with the reversal (so keys and
values get swapped when the list is reversed). I'd forgotten about
the ^max shorthand,
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:49:03PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
There's always:
for @gifts[$^day].pairs.reverse { my ($n,$g) = .kv; ... }
Typo (reversed order of $ and ^ in ^$day):
for @gifts[^$day].pairs.reverse { my ($n,$g) = .kv; ... }
Pm
