Hello,
looking into Perl 6 syntax I noticed that there are meta- and
hyperoperators to perform among others the classical functional map
and fold operations. However, if I understood this correctly, you can
only use these constructs to lift scalar *operators* to the domain of
arrays.
Coming from
On Mar 2, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and
replace it with $?KERNEL (ie. Linux) and maybe $?ARCH (ie. i386).
Thoughts?
I disagree.
User-space
Author: leto
Date: 2009-03-02 11:09:04 +0100 (Mon, 02 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25654
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
Log:
Fix typo in Numeric
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
===
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 17:04 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and replace it
with $?KERNEL (ie. Linux) and maybe $?ARCH (ie. i386). Thoughts?
The usual way to
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 17:04 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and replace it
with $?KERNEL (ie. Linux) and maybe $?ARCH
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 23:47 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
So, I think the proper name to the variables would be
$?ARCH and $*ARCH
Where they would stringify to the arch triplet, while providing
convenience methods for .cpu, .platform and .os.
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 10:39 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 23:47 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
Are we talking about $?VM vs. $?XVM here?
Well, yes... that adresses $?HOST_PERL and $?TARGET_PERL... but still
leaves $?HOST_ARCH and $?TARGET_ARCH, assuming not all
Hi,
Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson wrote:
Google has announced this year's Summer of Code[1]. The Perl
Foundation accepted one project (mentored by Moritz) related to Perl 6
last year[2]. I was wondering if there are any developers interested
in mentoring students on Perl 6-related projects this year.
Hello Hinrik,
I will be the organization admin for TPF in GSoC 2009, please read
more about it here:
http://leto.net/dukeleto.pl/2009/03/applying-to-google-summer-of-c.html
If you are a Perl-related project that wants to mentor a student in
GSoC, please contact me directly.
Cheers,
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 23:47 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
So, I think the proper name to the variables would be
$?ARCH and $*ARCH
Where they would stringify to the arch triplet, while providing
convenience
Hi,
Thomas Chust wrote:
Hello,
looking into Perl 6 syntax I noticed that there are meta- and
hyperoperators to perform among others the classical functional map
and fold operations. However, if I understood this correctly, you can
only use these constructs to lift scalar *operators* to the
On 2009 Mar 2, at 6:19, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Chris Dolan wrote:
On Mar 2, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and
replace it with
2009/3/2 Moritz Lenz ml...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de:
Thomas Chust wrote:
[...]
Therefore I think that it would be a nice addition for Perl 6 if the
X...X, ... and similar operators could be applied to anonymous
subroutines in addition to other operators. If such a syntactic change
wasn't
S04 mentions that statement modifiers behave as for perl5 (excpet that
you can have both an conditional modifier and a looping modifier on a
single statement.
Both then it gives this example, with be modifiers being operators
within an expression, not as modifiers of a statement.
line
14 matches
Mail list logo
