Am Montag, den 19.10.2009, 16:43 -0700 schrieb Jon Lang:
Raphael Descamps wrote:
I personally don't understand why we don't have a exclude and alias
operator in Perl 6 but I have not read all the synopses and don't have
an overview.
I don't think that it's explicitly spelled out
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Jon Lang datawea...@gmail.com wrote:
Because a method is part of a role, and ought to abide by the same
terms by which the role abides. If Logging doesn't do Numeric, it
shouldn't have any methods in it that won't work unless it does.
100% agreed.
So what
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mark J. Reed markjr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Jon Lang datawea...@gmail.com wrote:
Because a method is part of a role, and ought to abide by the same
terms by which the role abides. If Logging doesn't do Numeric, it
shouldn't have
I recently attempted to write a sample mutable role that made use of a
number of lvalue methods, and I had a bear of a time getting it to
work. Could we arrange for a more intuitive option to be available?
For example, allow the programmer to pass a writer code block in
through the rw trait, and
On 2009-Oct-20, at 7:55 am, Matthew Walton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Mark J. Reed markjr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Jon Lang datawea...@gmail.com
wrote:
Because a method is part of a role, and ought to abide by the same
terms by which the role abides.
On 2009-Oct-20, at 8:04 am, Jon Lang wrote:
The above example is of course trivial. A more serious example
might be one based off of a coordinate system:
role point {
has Num $x, Num $y;
method angle() is rw( { $.x = .r * cos($_); $.y = .r *
sin($_) } ) { return
HaloO,
On Tuesday, 20. October 2009 18:35:36 David Green wrote:
So what the OP wants to do is declare a method that is available on
all those invocants - and only those invocatnts - which do all of
roles X, Y, and Z. Granted, you can declare a new role XandYandZ
that does X, Y, and Z,
Author: masak
Date: 2009-10-21 00:03:48 +0200 (Wed, 21 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 28864
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
[S06] same-named non-anon positionals are a compile error
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Author: moritz
Date: 2009-10-21 00:15:32 +0200 (Wed, 21 Oct 2009)
New Revision: 28865
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
[S06] extend uniq name constraint to named parameters too
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:35 PM, David Green david.gr...@telus.net wrote:
I would expect $foo where {$_ ~~ X} and X $foo simply to be different
ways of writing the same thing, but whatever works!
Yes, but the where clause lets you test against multiple types at
once. They don't participate in
10 matches
Mail list logo
