Re: Factoring Arguments

2007-12-21 Thread Ryan Richter
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 08:41:54AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote: and so on, you might do something like: with qq :(c = false) { I think this can be done with normal currying, something like temp circumfix: := quote:qq.assuming(:!c); -ryan

Factoring Arguments

2007-12-21 Thread Jonathan Lang
I'm thinking aloud here, so please bear with me. A number of languages have a with ... construct that's intended to cut down on repetitive typing, by factoring the invocant out of every method call. Perl 6 also has this, in the form of given ...: given $foo.bar.baz { .dothis();

Re: Factoring Arguments

2007-12-21 Thread ajr
A number of languages have a with ... construct that's intended to cut down on repetitive typing, I hope I will be excused for dragging in the indecency, but it might be worth looking at the concepts COBOL used to mitigate its verbosity, (e.g. types defined in a structure that get inherited

Re: Factoring Arguments

2007-12-21 Thread Jonathan Lang
Ryan Richter wrote: Jonathan Lang wrote: and so on, you might do something like: with qq :(c = false) { I think this can be done with normal currying, something like temp circumfix: := quote:qq.assuming(:!c); That handles the specific example that I had in mind, but does so in a

Re: Factoring Arguments

2007-12-21 Thread Larry Wall
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 08:41:54AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote: : I'm wondering if something similar could be done for optional : arguments - something along the lines of within the following block, : assign value V to argument X of routine R by default. This would : allow for a similar factoring