[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Damian Conway) writes:
Larry has previously mentioned the prospect of Perl 6 module names
being extended to include version number and author.
Yes, we even talked about it extensively at the CPAN meeting in
Monterey 2 years ago. =)
--
ask bjoern hansen,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 05:32:40PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
I expect to end up with a multi-level system, where you can use anything from
a DNS name (guaranteed to contain dots) through author IDs (no dots) to
blessed top-level names for universally acclaimed modules, for some definition
of
Larry has previously mentioned the prospect of Perl 6 module names being extended to
include version number and author.
If this were to be done, would seem reasonable for the author component to simply be
the author's CPAN username. These are guaranteed unique, are frequently mnemonic, are
Larry has previously mentioned the prospect of Perl 6 module names being extended to
include version number and author.
If this were to be done, would seem reasonable for the author component to simply be
the author's CPAN username. These are guaranteed unique, are frequently mnemonic, are
On 6/18/02 6:10 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
Larry has previously mentioned the prospect of Perl 6 module names being
extended to include version number and author.
If this were to be done, would seem reasonable for the author component to
simply be the author's CPAN username. These are
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, John Siracusa wrote:
: On 6/18/02 6:10 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
: Larry has previously mentioned the prospect of Perl 6 module names being
: extended to include version number and author.
:
: If this were to be done, would seem reasonable for the author component to
:
On 6/18/02 8:32 PM, Larry Wall wrote:
I expect to end up with a multi-level system, where you can use anything from
a DNS name (guaranteed to contain dots) through author IDs (no dots) to
blessed top-level names for universally acclaimed modules, for some definition
of universal.
I'm not
On 6/16/02 1:50 AM, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Let's dump out the sack of namespace partitioning problems:
What if Acme decides it wants to release part of it's code as Open Source?
(Happens a lot). Does it release it as Com::Acme::Text::Thing or
Once nice thing about Java is the class naming convention that lets
individual companies (or even individuals, I guess) do custom development
that they can safely integrate with the standard Java classes and the work
of other companies/individuals without fear of namespace clashes. For
example,
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:35:48PM -0400, John Siracusa wrote:
Once nice thing about Java is the class naming convention that lets
individual companies (or even individuals, I guess) do custom development
that they can safely integrate with the standard Java classes and the work
of other
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:35:48PM -0400, John Siracusa wrote:
Once nice thing about Java is the class naming convention that lets
individual companies (or even individuals, I guess) do custom development
that they can safely integrate with
11 matches
Mail list logo
