S29 proposed revision

2006-07-05 Thread Aaron Sherman
Larry (bless his wire-photographing heart) took the time to re-vamp S29. Of course, this threw off all of my collating of S29, but that's fine since he's actually answered more of my questions than I could have hoped. The fourth of July weekend was fairly slow for me, so I started with Larry's

Re: S29 proposed revision

2006-07-05 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 16:09 -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote: The fourth of July weekend was fairly slow for me, so I started with Larry's S29 and went forward. My first pass at a revised S29 is attached. I already see one problem. as slipped in, which is an operator, not a function. -- Aaron