Re: We should have some YAPC talks on Perl 6

2001-01-12 Thread Nathan Torkington
John van V writes: If perl.org is unacceptable for some reason I can easily create a mailing list on puny.vm.org Thanks for the offer, but I don't think we'll need it. I think we're hampered right now by the fact that we don't know much about what perl6 is going to look like. Until we get

Re: We should have some YAPC talks on Perl 6

2001-01-12 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 02:39 PM 1/12/01 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote: John van V writes: If perl.org is unacceptable for some reason I can easily create a mailing list on puny.vm.org Thanks for the offer, but I don't think we'll need it. I think we're hampered right now by the fact that we don't know much

Re: We should have some YAPC talks on Perl 6

2001-01-12 Thread John van V
Giving talks at YAPC is a no brainer, and I see the criteria of creating public documents and the existance of a deadline being exceeding good things. Documenting the knowlege and preventing the authors from obfuscating the documents (by accident, of course) will generate far to much noise

Re: We should have some YAPC talks on Perl 6

2001-01-12 Thread Simon Cozens
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:11:56PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: Barring anyone else doing it, I should go to YAPC and talk about perl 6's guts, at least the bits available at that point. TPC too. ('Course, there's the question of getting there, but that's a separate issue) Well, if you can't,

Re: We should have some YAPC talks on Perl 6

2001-01-12 Thread Kirrily Skud Robert
I've got one ready to go on the topic of "Perl 6: the story so far". I'm presenting it next week at linux.conf.au and would be happy to submit it for YAPC and/or TPC. K.

We should have some YAPC talks on Perl 6

2001-01-11 Thread Nathan Torkington
--- start of forwarded message --- # CFP in English, followed by French (see below) # Third North American YAPC: First Call for Participation Yet Another Society calls for your participation in